Redleg

Well the difference is that the Eagles would have beaten us anyway, but the Tigers were handed the game by the umpires. We got a very bad run again, but GWS were robbed of the win.

Could we have a win in the game of precaution?

This is a very funny thread if you read most of the posts. Shows how little clue some people have. Exception being dee-luded's post number 12.

I make it 5 goals to eagles from 8 frees inside 50..

Who teaches these idiots to just bomb away into the forward line and watch it come back out for a goal at the other end. I haven't seen one pass to a leading forward yet.

McDonald had the chance to spoil Kennedy and connect and put him out of the game. He did neither. I thought it was a pathetic, soft effort. Lynch agreed.

Been saying it all week. Our selections this year have been poor in my opinion.

But they hate the rest of us. 3 shocking frees to eagles 20 metres out and we can't buy one. Holding the ball rule is either an Eagles free or play on if we have them.

Just watched the Tigers beat the Giants and the 3 best on the ground for the Tigers were all in green. Most disgraceful display from umpires you could see. Not that I care, but they handed the game to the Tigers,

Summed it up perfectly.

Heard Vandenberg should be back next week, though it might be at Casey.

I would bring in Garland, Hogan and JKH and look at dropping, Bail, Spencer and Riley.

Agree. As I have said before, those games are usually won by the good running teams.

Another injury. Russell Roberston injured in the Legends game.

I think the AFL will try and stop them losing too many players.

Bloody foxtel. I recorded the whole listed game and was [censored] as hell when the recording stopped 3.5 minutes from the end. These are digital times and recorded by remote and they should get it bloody right. I miss the end and the celebration of one of our best wins of recent times.

The simple answer is that our game and rules are open to interpretation by umpires and therefore not every decision will be the correct one.

Well that is great, back in OZ and the Dees aren't playing. Oh well I guess I can watch the Geelong replay.

Would love to see it fully examined as an option.

The more games we win from now and the more publicity we get, especially about the youngsters, the more we will be seen as an attractive proposition by players looking to move clubs. I would be talking up the players out injured and how they would improve the team as well.

Obviously I know JT but who is the other bloke, never heard of him.

Funny, coz I thought all the games in the top end have been won by quick running sides, not tall marking sides.

Personally I would be thrilled for Jack if he could come back better than ever to have a good career with us. After the events of last summer I would love to see Jack BOG, the next 3 times we play the Tigers, after he has recovered from his injury.

No Judd was a burst player who could explode away, whereas JT was strong and usually got his kick away. Judd would leave him for dead in acceleration. JT is a better mark than Judd though and that gives him another string to his bow.

Can still be traded if both parties agree.