burnthefushias

I'm sure Lamb and Taylor will be eager to replace McVee with 4 WA boys in this years draft so nothing to see here. On a serious note, if Moniz-Wakefield recovers well from his injury he can make that position his own next season.

Where did you find this stat?

What's with Geelong key forwards who have never been captain being selected as captain of the All-Australian team?

6: Hanks 5: Harris 4: Hore 3: Fitzsimon 2: Zanker 1: Paxman

6: Clayton Oliver 5: Christian Salem 4: Max Gawn 3: Harvey Langford 2: Bayley Fritsch 1: Trent Rivers

6: Gawn 5: Salem 4: Rivers 3: Petty 2: Viney 1: Van Rooyen

2 turnovers from Sparrow in the space of 10 seconds

He's classified as a non free agent because to be a restricted free agent you need to have spent eight years at your first club and be in the top 25% earners on the playing list, but it's a similar deal in terms of how a player navigates getting to another team when they're out of contract. The first option is negotiating a trade and if that isn't agreed upon between clubs, the non free agent can choose his contract length and dollar amount before nominating for either draft. So if McVee wants West Coast, we don't have a tremendous amount of leverage given their position in the pre-season draft.

6: Gawn 5: Petty (surprised I'm the first to give him votes) 4: Rivers 3: Langford 2: Oliver 1: Bowey

6: Gawn 5: Viney 4: Fritsch 3: Oliver 2: Petracca 1: Petty

We drop a 46 point lead to a bottom 4 team and the only changes we make are resting a 19 year old and omitting the sub, yet I'm not surprised.

6: Viney 5: Gawn 4: Rivers 3: Pickett 2: Fritsch 1: Oliver

That was genuinely sickening. In an 8 game span, St. Kildas only 2 wins are against Melbourne and one of those games involved the biggest 3 quarter time comeback in AFL history. What adjustments were made in the 4th quarter that were close to beneficial? Flood the 50 with numbers but leave multiple St. Kilda players unmarked while having no numbers in the corridor? Amateurish football, we let them play the game on their terms in attempting to simply defend a lead with 15 minutes to go and were punished thoroughly for it.

We're definitely better than our worst results this year but you could also argue we're not as good as our best results this year. Our worst results have been abysmal. We still have a reasonably strong nucleus of proven senior players, with some emerging guys, the issue is we're struggling to hide some of their fundamental weaknesses of the group (kicking skills, composure under pressure, goal-kicking accuracy) as the game continues to evolve with an added emphasis on those qualities. Structurally across all areas of the ground we are average and rely on individual brilliance too often. With several tweaks there as well as alterations positionally, we'd have less smashings against NM and GC, better results in Darwin and we could eek out these close games more regularly.

It's hard to beat the umpires but it's harder to beat an average side with below average execution. There were some good signs from some of the younger guys. Pickett is a generational talent, Langford is phenomenal, JVR is presenting and marking again and Jefferson dropped a few easy ones, but clunked a few good ones and worked himself into the game. Let them run the year out and with another pre-season they can both go up a level. Rivers and Langford need to be moved into the midfield, it seems like such an obvious move but it's clearly one that will not happen anytime soon, I think partly because Viney and Oliver lack positional versatility. Very strange that Petracca isn't playing in the forward line more with Pickett able to pick up the slack in the midfield. Having said that, the list is better than what we're dishing up, so I understand why people are disappointed. We need to upgrade Salem to kicking coach because he's one of the few guys (alongside the 19 year old Langford) who can consistently hit that 20 metre kick and the game is heading towards if you can't do that, you're going to struggle to win games.