Everything posted by Superunknown
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Based on that - gone for 3 at least. I still think Kaneās intervention is a portent of grim tidings for Maynard.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Hope the afl uses this as the basis of their case
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
I wish the board would issue a statement calling the obvious media bias into account then being very direct and forceful with the AFL regarding same. I still think Kaneās intervention is a grim portent for Maynard. If he gets off or a very light sentence, the AFL can appeal it, and we should insist we have input into that. I think everyone thinks weāre the good corporate citizen and have a soft underbelly. Itād be good to disabuse them of that perception I also tnink we need to seed some stories into the media widening the Overton window on this. āMelbourne insiders not authorised to speak on the record claim the club is looking for a 6 month suspension for Maynard given what looks like a deliberate attempt to hurt brayshaw. Etc etcā
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
I wish the board would issue a statement calling the obvious media bias into account then being very direct and forceful with the AFL regarding same. I still think Kaneās intervention is a grim portent for Maynard. If he gets off or a very light sentence, the AFL can appeal it, and we should insist we have input into that. I think everyone thinks weāre the good corporate citizen and have a soft underbelly. Itād be good to disabuse them of that perception
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Look Iād like to disagree but canāt. Remember the hits on Geelong in the 21 prelim? Whereās that nastiness? If by some miracle - and it will take some doing - we meet them, there should be a team mantra of taking him out, with a footy action.
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
Another commenter here said to me that whilst the players love Goodwin they wouldnāt run through a wall for each other. He said Stinnear has that with the womenās team. Itās been like this with Melb for as long as I can remember. Whereās the buy in for each other? The brayshaw injury exemplifies this as noted by others above . Itās really odd.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
When I was playing under 16s as a 12yo undersized thing in the manangatang saints in the late 80s those Ouyen thugs (Demons colours) were knocking us out and that makes Maynardās action actually really careful and showing ultra duty of care and then donāt forget we used to walk 10000km to school in the snow uphil and 200000km home also uphill with rocks coming downhill toward us before heading to the coal mines to work on the pyramids and we were lucky if we got fed once a year and ok boomer
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
This would be laughable if not so seriously stupid. Are they seriously suggesting players can attack others and it is up to the victim to ensure they protect themselves at all times. Isnāt Dangerfield on the players union? I hope Laura Kane is on the phone to him and all media bosses demanding a cease and desist on the incredibly unhelpful commentary. If nothing else it harms their litigation - here you have the media basically victim blaming ?! Jesus wept the collingwood protection racket is worse the imagined a decent silk prosecuting Maynard would be loving this. The systemic bias against the victim is incredible especially in the context of a Collingwood protection racket - which is what it is This is a big test for kane
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Blessed day. This is the way - AFL has spoken.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Misdirection/straw man. He wasnāt playing for us. I donāt feel sorry for him at all. Plays at the edge - live by the sword die by it. I would savour him missing a GF except I donāt want them to win it.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
if the afl is serious about concussion they will mount a very strong case including Maynardās alleged comments to media outlining his intent to damage/cause hurt. That establishes motive/intent and removes any ambiguity about malice or lack thereof
-
TRAINING: Sunday 9th September 2023
Club to read this and implement fix: Finals Fix: Manic Magpies expose Dees' massive flaw - but here's why they should have to win it all without Maynard
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Goodwin has been here before!
Itās the knock on effect. Melk crucial marks and taking quality back. JVR same plus clunking / halving contests. Iād suggest itās a bigger impact than just the goals
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
I think an interesting adjunct to this story is Christianās position. If itās true he was disinclined to refer Maynard to the tribunal, or had some difficulty coming to that decision - compelling Kane to step in -when taken alongside the broader context of the current litigation against the AFL, Christianās position appears untenable. Heās either hopelessly conflicted, or hopelessly incompetent, because this is a prima facie case for a lengthy on the spot sanction. Either way, he must go. A legal, ethical and PR nightmare. Itāll be interesting to see what happens there. If Iām Kane, Iām removing him at seasonās end and reviewing the MRO.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Shots fired shots fired Collingwood key backmanās final campaign imperiled by cowardly act Mobilise all media resources - turn positive PR up to the max gus Is a bigger man than I.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Good points, however - Maynard has form here and had other options and we know he had a duty of care. Heās a buffoon and if he wants play like he does, he has to wear the opprobrium. God imagine if this had been Greene on Daicos. The media would be baying for blood.
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton