Jump to content

Graeme Yeats' Mullet

Members
  • Posts

    4,805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Graeme Yeats' Mullet

  1. 5 changes While good to see some of the names is a major departure from the stability bias which has been evident over past month or two Hope it means freshness, and not blokes struggling with the speed if the game
  2. Ahh Dermie... Explanatory diarrhoea
  3. Can't see Kent coming into a fwd line with Garlett and Spargo JKH stays in and Garlett out
  4. Pretty sure that's wound up in the player rating category somehow 19 - 553
  5. He's practically the same size as McGovern and eyeballing him close up at training a few weeks ago was confronting - he's a big unit Agree he's young but the point is challenge is set, opportunity is his to tear it apart
  6. Weido has his chance to step up and it couldn't be more important I'm sceptical but looking forward to being proven wrong! Built like Tarzan Let's see who he plays like...
  7. Tmac said a couple of weeks back, "it's just a team sheet - wouldn't pay too much attention to it" Hibberd and Tyson both out of position, just being clear they're named Would say Melk and Kent own those positions and leaves 2 more for the bench... Be guessing as to who
  8. Hibberd, Melksham will also come in according to SG. With Weido that's 3. Assume Pedo out (still feel uneasy about this) Can't see 2 more happening... Hannan probably lacking match fitness. Maybe Kent for Spargo?
  9. I'm not so sure Getting into a wrestle and getting forced under the ball or flat handed dropped marks is not what we need I want to see a leading option to demand our mids lower the eyes. Perhaps smaller fwd line and rotate Oliver and Petracca deeper
  10. I tend to agree with this as the only 'discretionary' change
  11. Goody has deferred to stability over past few weeks Perhaps minimum changes? In: Melksham, Hibberd Out: Hogan, Hunt
  12. Prefer Jeffy or Spargo rested and JKH staying in Otherwise good
  13. Agree He'll be worth more to Freo that way
  14. Maybe if he did lead someone might kick it in front of him
  15. Not today worst disposal efficiency in the team But if you're right then he's not our full forward solution so he shouldn't be played there He also is not a strong lead and mark, I'm sure his teammates kicking on his head doesn't help much but we need a full forward who can lead and mark
  16. Maybe... Care to share some insight as to why?
  17. Not sure what your point is? AFL app has the stats as I stated
  18. We have an improving list built around a core of solid performers But we've always held on to guys we like who don't perform because we see them through rose coloured glasses Hogan I think is one
  19. He is a really bad kick
  20. 19 disposals at 42% efficiency (9 pts also not 15% btw) If he could kick, we win and play finals
×
×
  • Create New...