Jump to content

DeleteUser

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DeleteUser

  1. I am really glad I found Demonland (thanks Browney!). It is really opening my eyes to footy and is a really insightful read. You guys do an ace job. (Also, embarrassingly, caused me to sign up as a member for the first time in the 31 years I've been barracking.)
  2. Maybe he spends a lot of time swinging his leg at fighting dogs and has forgotten legs are for footy.
  3. DeleteUser replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I don't know, is it?
  4. I certainly took his point.
  5. I thought he was good - and I agree - give him some confidence that the club backs him. I don't think he deserves to be dropped yet and has a role to play. Unless (note I said unless, not until) he has a run of offs (or there's simply no space due to the opposition that week), back him in. Couple of goals, some marks, good disposal...
  6. He was everywhere. And I thought silky-smooth in general.
  7. DeleteUser replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Plus we trust the high performance unit has him AFL seniors-ready.
  8. DeleteUser replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Agree with this. Having max "resting" floating around grabbing marks whilst Tmac is running riot is great flexibility and dynamism. Hard to match. (At least until we run into better opposition). plus he jagged two. Goals are still goals.
  9. DeleteUser replied to btdemon's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Agree re SYDNEY and Geelong - I think pretty much any team is gettable if a side with Viney plays for 4 quarters with no stranglew$$$nk and no going to sleep for a quarter (both traits lurking below the surface - still to scarred to trust them). Think Geelong have our measure, they're still a bonza side. Think The same for Sydney. QBH is the key. Lock away everyone's LR Evoque and ski lodge keys to make sure we're there. Eagles look hot to trot but hard to tell from over here
  10. DeleteUser replied to btdemon's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Realistically 2 losses to adelaide loss to port, wce and probably freo (even though they were pus today), SYDNEY, cats, pies win against gws and others miss the 8 and rue Max's r1 miss and hawks tigers floggings and not flogging bombers saints
  11. Was it just fatigue in the last 1/4, but we were caught out of position trailing a sainter a fair few times. If fatigue , fair enough. 21 and sunny in brissy next week but sundown early (5pm), hopefully weather not a factor.
  12. DeleteUser replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I though Weideman was good. Goals are goals. Ineffective in the ruck (that I saw) - at least for now - can be built on. Options, options.
  13. DeleteUser replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'm not an expert, don't see much dees on tv but hunt was a liability today
  14. He's no Mark McClure though - the most miserable commentator out there. P
  15. It's a fair point though there're no turns - earn it
  16. 0.5% the memory remains
  17. Strap yourselves in / so begins the infamous Melb fade out followed by 12 goals by st kilda and inaction by Goodwin
  18. On any other day we'd be the ones 3.8. Lucky to be kicking straight (er)
  19. Must kick on from here. Like by 10 goals. Anything less and I demand demonland meltdown.
  20. And then he makes me look stupid by jagging one
  21. Tyson needs to go, good gracious
  22. Tmac is worth every $.
  23. DeleteUser replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ah WTF, why isn't it at Carrara? I was half considering the drive up from the Northern Rivers.
  24. DeleteUser replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    best hair in the league
  25. ? had a squiz it's worse than here. End of Days stuff! "Dees by 80"