Males

Overall I'm pretty happy with that half. ??

Spencil!

I think ANB is color blind, some of his handballs tonight have murdered us.

I might crack the Lid if we beat West Coast next game.

We beat Bulldogs who looked like they took the game seriously, but it was their first hit out too, so they might have been just a bit more rusty then us?

Carlton, well they were plain [censored].

West Coast, will be their 3rd game too, and I'm expecting them to be near full strength against us. Really looking forward to this game.

On 22 November 2016 at 2:18 PM, Sir Why You Little said:

I am still waiting for the Demon shop to move so i can use it. 

Do not ever attempt to get there by Taxi or be able to get a Taxi to stop when you want to leave....

It's a short walk from Richmond or Jolimont Train Stations, normally how I get there when I visit the shop.

If that happened I wouldn't renew my membership, and to be honest, would probably lose interest in the game. ??

I had hoped we were going to grab Brayshaw.

Might get him as a Rookie.

Until Melbourne release the statement and we find out more, it's a bit hard to judge. I'll admit that I was angry when I first heard about it on the radio today, but if it was a low reading, under .02, I'm happy to give him the benefit of the doubt, cop his whack from the Leadership group and that's the end of it.

On the other hand, if it was a high reading and he really should have known that he had alcohol in his system, he deserves to play the first few games for Casey.

Hopefully this is a one off and turns out to be a blessing in disguise.

Without knowing what was written in these so called text messages, I don't believe Whitfield has actually breached the rules? I can't be bothered searching the rules now, but I thought that the player has up to 10 days to notify ASADA of new address, or where they can be tested, as long as someone from the club knows where he is? He was staying at a club officials house, so you could argue that the club knew where he was and could have told ASADA, if ASADA had turned up to test him.

Technicality I know, but that's the excuse I would use. ? 

10 hours ago, AngryAtCasey said:

Next move.  Dunn, Pick 57 & 59 (340 points) to the filth for Picks 47 (316) & 83 (0) .  Puts them in a better position re father/sons.

The trade next years future 2nd Round Pick to Saints for 36.

Instead of Pick 47 in this scenario, would it be worth more to us to try for their next years 3rd round pick? 

I seriously hope we don't cave in, play hard ball, if they don't except next years 2nd round pick, then bad luck, let them keep Hibberd for another year. We have to use 3 picks in this draft and we have the bonus of picking up Lewis, keep pick 29.

I think he's worth pick 48, just not sure we need to use it. Do a deal with Lewis to join us after next season if the Hawks want to play hard ball.

MELBOURNE 26, 44, 62, 80.

26 will go on the Hibberd trade.

80 for Lewis, I'd definetaly take. Runner up in this years B&F, shows he's still playing well, and I think he could teach our young midfield a bit. 3 year deal with provisions on the last 2, possible coaching job etc.

62 for Lewis, I'd still probably take this deal. 

44 for Lewis, I'm not keen on this deal. I'd rather poach him after next season, be cheaper for us. 2 year deal, possible move into coaching.

Pretty sure I posted this in another thread, but I recall one of the commentators on trade night stating that they believed that as long as he could stay injury free, he'd be the steal of the draft at No.9.

I'm quite happy with the 3 games I've seen from him, he's showed plenty of potential for a first year key position player.

One of my favourite players, had a shocking run of luck with the injury and concussions, looking forward to seeing him next year with a full pre season under his belt.

57 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

That's it, I'm going to the Grand Final next weekend.

Does our Melbourne Membership get us into the Grandfinal?

5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

A few on here wanted him gone to...

And we know what sort of Clowns some posters on here are too. ?

ANB was an emergency for the Port game, flew back and had a great game for Casey by the looks, he might get his chance if Garlett doesn't recover.

1 minute ago, picket fence said:

All good pionts, but with one Flaw,!! He can't kick! IMO

So you're saying that his field kicking and shots at goal inside 40m are bad? And I'm talking about on average, not after one bad game. I'm fairly certain I could look up a bad game from Dunstal and Locket and state they were crap kicks too in that case.

He's a young key position player in his second year, not many key position players constantly play good football in their first few years. He rarely gets out marked and brings the ball to ground if he doesn't grab it himself, he takes the number one backman each week and his field kicking is above average to elite. 

The kid is a gun and we will miss him if he left, in saying that, I still don't understand why commentators/journos keep going on about his contract, he's contracted for another year, why should he re-sign before the end of next year? I wouldn't if I was in his shoes, even if I knew I wasn't going to leave the club I'd hold out until the middle of next season at the least. 

7 hours ago, daisycutter said:

it wasn't fair. Shirtfronts are now illegal. full stop. It was a free kick to clarrie at least. Under the convoluted tribunal laws he may just get a fine, but only because clarrie is one tough nut. Still, the afl will not remove this type of dangerous tackle if they continually let players off at the tribunal just because the receiver was lucky and didn't get sufficiently injured

Technically you might be right on it being classed as a shirtfront, daisycutter?

I was trying to look at the incidents mentioned from an MRP point of view, the way they have adjudicated in the past, I believed they would state that it was a fair bump with no contact to head, therefore no suspension, and if it was the other way around I would have expected Clarrie to get off too.  That being said, I believe the MRP stated that Rioli did make contact to the head, therefore I believe he should have copped a week instead of a fine.

2 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

They were 2 game clear.
Not sure they were putting too much thought into percentage.
 

 

Yes, but their percentage is so much lower then the teams around them that they cannot afford to finish on equal points, they knew they had to win the game against us.

Rioli's bump was fair, and if it was one of our boys who did it, I'd be [censored] if he got suspended. I thought his lifting tackle on Weeds was worse.

Mitchell hit Watts with an open hand, no suspension. I actually hope they don't look at it too closely because it looked like Watts sort of grabbed Mitchell's face first, play on, nothing to see here. ?

I've only watched the replay twice though...so far. ?

I remember one of the commentators on draft night stated that if his body holds up, Weeds could be the steal of the draft at 9.  I'm not expecting anything flash from him, just hope he has a solid game.

Even though I agree that Jones has been down on form this year, no one in our club busts his arse as much as he does, or for as long as he has, plus it's not all about on field performance.

If Jones still wants to Captain, I still want him as Captain. ?