Jump to content

waynewussell

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by waynewussell

  1. Rivers was excellent yesterday. He will come in... maybe for Turner (who I thought showed he can succeed at the level today) Dunstan (also unstoppable yesterday) for Sparrow May comes in for M Brown The rest is dependent on injuries (Petty again, Lever, Max) If Max has to rest there is only one viable replacement (if he is fit)
  2. May be the making of Daniel Turner!
  3. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Is it possible that I (an MFC member who attends) am being scolded for poor attendance by someone who was not at the game?
  4. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Do people think that there is likely to be a sudden surge at the turnstiles on the back of what Christian has said?
  5. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'll listen to the clip when you read and respond to my articles
  6. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think Christian's comments are an indication that he is open to the wider debate (beyond MFC). He is responding to the notion that overall crowd figures are down. He is giving the broad player perspective that big crowds fire up the players. He wants bigger crowds.
  7. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Interesting article on this topic, pre-Covid - 2017 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-25/richard-hinds-agony-low-crowd-attendances-footy-codes/8839466 "Indeed, given global trends, perhaps the pertinent question is not why fewer people are attending games. It is why so many still do."
  8. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'm simply pointing out that, by comparison in this downturn of attendances (the reasons for which I have previously hypothesised), MFC is holding up well... Your serve Dr.
  9. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So, your saying we're up over 500% since 1901?
  10. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    These are the 2022 attendance figures for Victorian clubs at home v Freo MFC 29812 Essendon 23935 Geelong 20136
  11. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    In our most recent post-Premiership year, 1965, our average MCG attendance was 38,928. This year, 2022, our average MCG attendance is 42,662. We continue to hold up well when the data is considered!
  12. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Did we make it to the G on Saturday, Dr? I did, and I, along with the majority of those in MCC area, gave it my all when it came to being noisy. Stop generalising about the crowd.
  13. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There are much broader forces influencing current attendance than a bunch of MFC members choosing to stay at home. Covid had, and continues to have, an impact on our behaviours, our mental and physical well-being, our cost of living etc. The times they are a changing'! We have shifted how we consume just about everything, including entertainment! Football has moved rapidly towards a 'streamed' product (as have cinema, theatre and a great deal of goods and services). Is the AFL deeply concerned about crowd numbers? (Less bums on plastic seats and more on the couch in front of TV) I think not... as long as revenue is up, they don't mind! Be thankful that our crowds are top 5 for home games and on a par with a quarter of a century of data!
  14. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Apologies if these statistics have already been posted in this thread. Melbourne v Sydney, MCG Saturday 4th June 2022, Attendance = 32,753 Melbourne v Sydney, Average Attendance, 2000 - 2021 = 32,337 the 2022 attendance was better than 9 off the 15 games between the clubs at the MCG since 2000 Problem? What problem?
  15. Just had a laugh with my son (who also attended) about having a crisis meeting when we are top of the ladder! My spin is that we just got beaten by two late (dubious free kicks included!) goals by a potential top four team when we have injuries and out of form troops. We can afford to do some creative thinking. This is what we came up with in our morning after analysis. Jackson plays key forward (BBB to find form with Casey - a bit like last year! M Brown or Weid to the bench) Majak plays from the bench to give Max a rest when needed ( this could be as low as 45% ground time. Majak won't be embarrassed in the ruck contests!) Rivers in for Hunt (been steady/consistent but dropped off in the two losses when we were scrambling for backline cover) May comes in for Tomlinson (or Petty if he is injured). Salem, Harmes & Tomlinson will be better for the run. Hibberd not far away) We have become too predictable! Time to show we have a few new tricks up our sleeve. On yesterday's form, too soon for JVR (yes we also watched the entire Casey game). Turner close to a call-up.
  16. Well, some of these comments make it clear who opted for the comfort of the lounge chair last night! Jordon - 4 qtr contributor Pickett - excellent solo efforts Oliver - finds a way
  17. waynewussell replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I admire her honesty, athleticism & personal mantra. Well worth watching... gives an insight into the difficulties faced in deflecting dogged prejudice.
  18. Turner played very well today, particularly in the first half. The pro Frankston commentators were pouring praise on him!
  19. Hibberd was on earlier as well, number 45 it seems.
  20. After all the controversy about 60 + free kicks, the first one of round 11 is non existent!!
  21. I reckon Majak was outstanding yesterday. It was one of the most dominant ruck displays I've seen at any level!
  22. I think that's happened once since the start of the 2019 season (rd 10 v Crows)
  23. There is inconsistency in the way umpires throw the ball up! For that reason, it is not the perfect replacement for the bounce that commentators suggest. Some umpires throw it higher, some umpires throw it less than vertical... the ball ends up following them as they backtrack. Some umpires throw it as quickly as they can, whilst others wait to settle. All of these variations have an effect on timing and positioning for the competing rucks... not that far removed from what happens with the bounce!
  24. I suggest, if we must go down this road, that players/teams be given a warning before being penalised, as is the case with 666.
  25. It's blatantly obvious that the AFL, itself, has a real problem with respect for the umpires! Otherwise they would have appointed a retired VFL/AFL umpire to the position of 'rules maker', laws of the game committee!