Jump to content

Devil is in the Detail

Members
  • Posts

    828
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Devil is in the Detail

  1. You talking about the old guy in the back ground.
  2. Love how they have "tried" to photoshop Hogan's crossed arms between Vince's arm and torso.
  3. I think that would more cover tainted food. eg Alberto Contador. Occasions were they had absolutely no opportunity to research information related to the drug. The players may have been told "We are injecting drug named 'x' into you, the club says it is OK". I would think that would be the players opportunity to check the information of said drug. That clause would only cover them if they made an effort to do some research on the drug themselves Depends on what the players said to WADA. eg. They had made an effort to research the drug. They asked the club what the drug was on multiple occasions but the club refused to give them the information. If the players just accepted what was put into their body without asking the appropriate questions, they have only themselves to blame.
  4. Sorry IVA, WADA see it as: "It is up to the responsibility of the person to check with the relevant authorities (ASADA, WADA) about the nature of the drug, even when the employer says it is OK"
  5. Will still be a better mark than Dawes
  6. It will change.
  7. Hirds reaction when EFC players asked if the drugs were legal.
  8. Maybe Stuie vs BB and Chris
  9. We may have something written in the contract to help protect us. i.e. if found guilty maybe suspended pay.
  10. Just make sure they get your best side.
  11. I reckon one person did. Then faked the "niddle phobia" to get out of the program.
  12. Get your own joke DD http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?/topic/39298-welcome-to-the-melbourne-football-club-clayton-oliver/?view=findpost&p=1188346
  13. It was funny, the first highlight reel stopped the highlight shot when the kick was in mid air. I was thinking that was he going to be like Moloney and just bomb the ball without any accuracy. Then the AFL released a highlight reel where it showed where his kicks were landing and most of them hit a target. That made my more comfortable selecting him at #3.
  14. Probably year after. Don't think Weideman will play next year's QB.
  15. Yeah could come to grips that 3 came before 4
  16. Same and will be very dangerous.
×
×
  • Create New...