Ethan Tremblay

I think that's basically it, if a trade comes along that will better the list, he's gone.

Basically said he couldn't guarantee 'any' player will be there next year and it's all about improving our list. He's told the players talks about them moving on isn't to scare them it's to improve the list and win more than 7 games. Buckley then stepped in and said another clubs trash can be another clubs treasure. (Was updating original post with a run down and accidently deleted it)

(_o_)

I'm only interested in players who will help us move up the ladder not sustain our position. It's a no.

My votes go to Motlop. Apparently asking upward of 700k.

Dangerfield and Henderson are half of the AFL?I understand Geelong are mentioned in a lot of deals but the trade Henderson is requesting is to Geelong. You think we should have a dip and Mitch Clark him?

Won't happen he's off to Geelong.

Lachie Henderson has officially requested a trade and will not play any further games this season. #carltank.

Not while we have Dawes.

Came on to read about Wines - Read about Toumpas instead...

Such as?

Wouldn't pay anywhere near 600k for Howe. 500k for Motlop however..

One of the few that I feel would be loyal.

They'd be stupid not to given his current form.

It's true, his dad's uncle knows the guy who cleans the shitters and he said he heard it from someone.

That's far from circumstantial evidence.Sounds like someone talking shizen.

Prestia was Demons, I believe he still barracks for us..

The appeal of NicNat is his marketability. Living in WA I have a lot of mates who support the Eagls. They know he is overrated, there's never any debate. But the kids love him, he brings in the money. Commentators obviously get sucked in as well.

On the good stuff tonight eh fence.Sarcasm is lost obviously lost on you. We have a prize for you, it's a big wooden penis.

Not being rude Monde but don't quite understand your post. If your sources are from within the industry why would they be rumours? Unless they are purely speculating themselves.

Ruckmen from different drafts were being compared, more so to discuss the development and coming along of Gawn. A poster suggested NicNat to be elite, Gawns stats were simply compared with his to discuss if NicNat was really elite.The Watts v Nicnat debate is a different issue, comparing picks 1 and 2 from the same draft. All player comparisons will cease from here mein fuhrer!

Unsure if your post is in reply to mine or not willmoy. My point was that Gawn is or at least will be a better footballer than Nic Nat, I'm not just talking exclusively about tapping the ball. Nic Nat is 25 and played 123 games, Gawn is 23 and played 23 games. 100 games and 2 years age gap is a lot especially when talking about ruckmen. I hope Gawn continues his development because I'm more excited by him than Nic Nat.

'Elite'No way is he elite. He's a decent tap ruckman that's about it. Not sure what your referring to when you say he does more than what is captured in your 'run of the mill disposals' considering everything is captured. He averages one mark, 12 disposals (at 62%), 33 hitouts, 4 score involvements, 4 tackles. Gawn averages five marks, 15 disposals (75%), 40 hitouts, 5 score involvements, 2 tackles. I'm not saying Gawn is better but Nic Nat is far from being elite. Gawn has a long way to go but I believe he will be a better footballer than Nic Nat.

I was sitting next to my old man at the game and said the exact same thing. Haha

He kicked a goal from just outside the 50. Therefore the kick was at least 55m. I think he's sorted it out. He had tight hamstrings a few weeks ago hence the reason he struggled kicking long.