Jump to content

Featured Replies

Hi nut - only time for quick reply now - but always happy to discuss with you because you seem rational - on my phone on train so hope my answer makes sense (find it hard to tell from this tiny screen )

Do i think the kids were deliberately put in harm's way? I've got no idea. It's possible of course - from what we saw in Indonesia last week anything is possible. But i also know that demonstrations are mainly a young mans game and that where you've got 18 year olds throwing rocks chances are there's going to be a lot of 15 year olds. As i said before i was at the Melbourne apartheid demos (and numerous anti Vietnam War ones) when I was 15. 

Let me ask you a question in reply How can you say you "struggle " with the violence? That worries me. I have no equivocation at al l . There were a hundred unarmed protesters killed by one of the most sophisticatedmilitary forces in the world. It was barbaric.

 

 

 
52 minutes ago, Jara said:

Do i think the kids were deliberately put in harm's way? I've got no idea. It's possible of course - from what we saw in Indonesia last week anything is possible.

Hi Jara

 

Please, this has nothing to do with Indonesia or Muslims. Please remember that Palestine before the Balfour and the Brits 'gave' it to the Zionists - as though it ever belonged to them in the first place - was an entity consisting of Muslims, Christians of many denominations, that the concept of Palestine has absolutely nothing to do with Muslim Extremism. That's really clouding the argument and falling into the Muslim equals Terrorist paradigm which has been deliberately 'constructed' by recent Neo-Con extremists.

3 hours ago, Jara said:

 

Let me ask you a question in reply How can you say you "struggle " with the violence? That worries me. I have no equivocation at al l . There were a hundred unarmed protesters killed by one of the most sophisticatedmilitary forces in the world. It was barbaric.

 

 

Let me rephrase - i deplore all violence  - i struggle with the futility of the bloodshed and seemingly no solution to a centuries old problem

 
2 hours ago, nutbean said:

Let me rephrase - i deplore all violence  - i struggle with the futility of the bloodshed and seemingly no solution to a centuries old problem

Hi Nutbean

 

I too find you great to chat with and I appreciate your opinions. However, I must take you up on the notion that this is a centuries old problem. If you mean this problem originated in the very late 19th century when Zionists starting buying Palestinian land then I grant it is centuries old.

Other than that, please allow me to remind you that before british Mandate 'rule', Jerusalem was the epicentre of the Judaic religion and its offsprings Christianity and the Muslim faith. As far as I know under the Ottomans each managed to live with each other in harmony and peace. Allow me to remind you that the problem arose when the Palestinian population got wind of the end goal of Zionism, namely to take their land, by hook or by crook - witness Deir yassin and all of the other less publicized  examplesthnic cleansing.

Israel-hating Leftist weirdos will disagree with this video.  So by all means go through each point and articulate why you disagree.

 


1 hour ago, ProDee said:

Israel-hating Leftist weirdos will disagree with this video.  So by all means go through each point and articulate why you disagree.

 

No Thanks. I've had a gutful of Israeli lies and propaganda and half truths and phony history shoved up my clacker.

If I were you, I'd read Miko Peled, Shlomo Sand and Ilan Pappe. All Israeli Jews who see Israel for what it is. Two of them are Historians, the other is the son of one of Israel's most famous generals. All of them would know much more about this topic than the likes of you.

8 hours ago, dieter said:

Hi Jara

 

Please, this has nothing to do with Indonesia or Muslims. Please remember that Palestine before the Balfour and the Brits 'gave' it to the Zionists - as though it ever belonged to them in the first place - was an entity consisting of Muslims, Christians of many denominations, that the concept of Palestine has absolutely nothing to do with Muslim Extremism. That's really clouding the argument and falling into the Muslim equals Terrorist paradigm which has been deliberately 'constructed' by recent Neo-Con extremists.

Sorry, Dieter - you're right, go course (I did say I was sitting on the train - hard to write on the phone). I know that many of the leading spokespeople for the dispossessed (Edward Said, Hanan Ashwari, for example - alas, not Joe Hockey) are Palestinian Christians. I dare say though, that the continual massacre of unarmed protesters in Gaza does a lot to feed the fundamentalist fire.

This is also very good and once again mad Leftists won't rebuke it.  Why ?  They don't know how.

 

 
18 minutes ago, Jara said:

Sorry, Dieter - you're right, go course (I did say I was sitting on the train - hard to write on the phone). I know that many of the leading spokespeople for the dispossessed (Edward Said, Hanan Ashwari, for example - alas, not Joe Hockey) are Palestinian Christians. I dare say though, that the continual massacre of unarmed protesters in Gaza does a lot to feed the fundamentalist fire.

Yes, but we need to focus on the big picture: fundamentalist idiots like Greg Sheridan take the bait and feed it to the masses, that Hamas is a Muslim Terrorist group. Like I say, Islam has absolutely nothing to do with the Colonialist takeover of Palestine, a region that accommodated each and every religion for centuries. Well, until the Crusades when so-called Christian propaganda and intolerance created the atrocities the Crusaders committed, in god's name, would you believe? 

3 hours ago, ProDee said:

Israel-hating Leftist weirdos will disagree with this video.  So by all means go through each point and articulate why you disagree.

 

I had a look at it (even though it was posted by a Russian troll bot, or whatever Choke said he was) - from the look of this article : http://mediareviewnet.com/2018/03/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/  it's produced by an organisation backed by the Israeli intelligence service. The presenter, David Brog, is apparently a cousin of former Israeli PM Ehud Barak. 

 

For a more objective analysis of the Two-State solution, just look it up on Wikipedia. Very fair summary there. 


5 minutes ago, ProDee said:

This is also very good and once again mad Leftists won't rebuke it.  Why ?  They don't know how.

 

You sure have a deep pool of lies and propaganda...Keep dredging in your cesspool, ProDee, you belong there...

8 minutes ago, ProDee said:

This is also very good and once again mad Leftists won't rebuke it.  Why ?  They don't know how.

 

Pro, you're nowhere near as scary now we know you're just a Russian troll bot.

2 minutes ago, Jara said:

I had a look at it (even though it was posted by a Russian troll bot, or whatever Choke said he was) - from the look of this article : http://mediareviewnet.com/2018/03/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/  it's produced by an organisation backed by the Israeli intelligence service. The presenter, David Brog, is apparently a cousin of former Israeli PM Ehud Barak. 

 

For a more objective analysis of the Two-State solution, just look it up on Wikipedia. Very fair summary there. 

Like I wrote initially, ProDee has a deep reserve of Israeli condoned/produced bulldust which relies mainly on fiction and downright atrocious lies.

5 minutes ago, Jara said:

I had a look at it (even though it was posted by a Russian troll bot, or whatever Choke said he was) - from the look of this article : http://mediareviewnet.com/2018/03/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/  it's produced by an organisation backed by the Israeli intelligence service. The presenter, David Brog, is apparently a cousin of former Israeli PM Ehud Barak. 

 

For a more objective analysis of the Two-State solution, just look it up on Wikipedia. Very fair summary there. 

Refute the arguments.  

Can you ?  

This is the problem with the Left.  They can NEVER refute argument.

Of course Prager is a conservative and a Jew.  And you don't need to use google to let us know about this particular presenter.  That in itself doesn't mean they're wrong.  Unless, of course, you can refute the arguments.  Naturally, you can't.  Why ?  They're using FACTS.

Jara, just stick to googling who's providing the information and deciding which side to pick.  It's a dumb way to live life, but it suits the Left, who always simply choose a side. 

No wonder you like footy.  You just need to choose a side.

14 minutes ago, ProDee said:

This is also very good and once again mad Leftists won't rebuke it.  Why ?  They don't know how.

 

Oh god - why do I do it? - I wasted another 5 minutes of my life looking at another of The Russian's wanky clips because I thought - oh well, this guys from a University - he might have something to say - then I looked it up. Prager University is NOT A UNIVERSITY. It is an online channel established to broadcast the views of more lunar-right American gazillionaires. 

 


3 minutes ago, Jara said:

Oh god - why do I do it? - I wasted another 5 minutes of my life looking at another of The Russian's wanky clips because I thought - oh well, this guys from a University - he might have something to say - then I looked it up. Prager University is NOT A UNIVERSITY. It is an online channel established to broadcast the views of more lunar-right American gazillionaires. 

 

Once again, you simply CANNOT refute any argument and simply check the side.

I present a challenge to you.  Take your time.  

Refute his points.  I dare you.

3 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Refute the arguments.  

Can you ?  

This is the problem with the Left.  They can NEVER refute argument.

Of course Prager is a conservative and a Jew.  And you don't need to use google to let us know about this particular presenter.  That in itself doesn't mean they're wrong.  Unless, of course, you can refute the arguments.  Naturally, you can't.  Why ?  They're using FACTS.

Jara, just stick to googling who's providing the information and deciding which side to pick.  It's a dumb way to live life, but it suits the Left, who always simply choose a side. 

No wonder you like footy.  You just need to choose a side.

Now listen, Russian. I've already wasted ten minutes of my life looking at your Israeli/Christian zionist videos.  I'm not wasting any more time refuting their simplistic arguments - why don't you do it for me? You seem so keen. Just look up the PLO's website, or some such thing - I'm sure you'll find just as much propaganda from the other side. 

1 minute ago, ProDee said:

Once again, you simply CANNOT refute any argument and simply check the side.

I present a challenge to you.  Take your time.  

Refute his points.  I dare you.

Life's too short (and so, I suspect, are you)

1 minute ago, Jara said:

Now listen, Russian. I've already wasted ten minutes of my life looking at your Israeli/Christian zionist videos.  I'm not wasting any more time refuting their simplistic arguments - why don't you do it for me? You seem so keen. Just look up the PLO's website, or some such thing - I'm sure you'll find just as much propaganda from the other side. 

If they're simplistic you'd be able to.  You're not.  You're a dud.  You're an intellectual lightweight.  You know it and anyone reading this knows it.  It's embarrassing for you.  Set a challenge you can't refute a single argument, because you don't like who's stating the argument.  Is there anything weaker than that.  I'll mail you a white feather.

Back to ignore, along with Balwyn's physically challenged son of one of Hitler's best. 

Hmmm... that just about confirms my last post. Small man syndrome. 


Hey - hang on - before you ignore me - that last sentence makes no sense - Balwyn's physically challenged son of...wtf? Have you forgotten to take your tablets again?

  • Author
12 minutes ago, ProDee said:

If they're simplistic you'd be able to.  You're not.  You're a dud.  You're an intellectual lightweight.  You know it and anyone reading this knows it.  It's embarrassing for you.  Set a challenge you can't refute a single argument, because you don't like who's stating the argument.  Is there anything weaker than that.  I'll mail you a white feather.

Back to ignore, along with Balwyn's physically challenged son of one of Hitler's best. 

White feathers now! What’s this 1918? 

Pro I implored you to see your doctor ASAP last week but you obviously didn’t follow up and the medication has worn off and you are raving again or at least providing links to raving lunatics from non universities and other nutjob web sites. Are they the same sites that deny climate change? Again I suggest you to see your physician immediately! 

15 minutes ago, Jara said:

Hey - hang on - before you ignore me - that last sentence makes no sense - Balwyn's physically challenged son of...wtf? Have you forgotten to take your tablets again?

As I said, a very long time ago, why the hell do we bother arguing with fascist fanatics?

 
Just now, Earl Hood said:

White feathers now! What’s this 1918? 

Pro I implored you to see your doctor ASAP last week but you obviously didn’t follow up and the medication has worn off and you are raving again or at least providing links to raving lunatics from non universities and other nutjob web sites. Are they the same sites that deny climate change? Again I suggest you to see your physician immediately! 

Cute.

Why don't you comment on the content in the videos.

Hint, you instinctively won't agree with the assertions, so articulate to me why they're factually wrong.

Can you ?

2 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

White feathers now! What’s this 1918? 

Pro I implored you to see your doctor ASAP last week but you obviously didn’t follow up and the medication has worn off and you are raving again or at least providing links to raving lunatics from non universities and other nutjob web sites. Are they the same sites that deny climate change? Again I suggest you to see your physician immediately! 

Physician/ Morticia/ Surgeon, any would do. Sounds like a Lobotomy would be a kind prognosis. No doubt, this post will be 'censored' but I don't see how it's any different to any of PD's insane 'Leftie' accusations.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 10 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 211 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Geelong

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 62 replies
    Demonland