Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (â‹®) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Changes to Total Player Payments

Featured Replies

 

I still think there needs to be a legitimate way to spend less than 95% of the cap so that clubs with crap lists aren't forced to pay their players the same as the premiers.

I understand it is part of the players CBA but there is no reason why clubs can't spend as little as they want and then pay the remaining "cap space" into a central fund that is divided and shared by all 720 players equally at the end of the season.

The players then get the exact amount of their CBA (no underpaying).

No clubs are forced to pay overs to a crap list.

Poor on field clubs have more salary room to chase other players.

No club can "save money" by skimping on player payments.

As all clubs are forced to pay 100% each year, it will create a bigger driving force to spend on players to improve on field.

Surely this is really obvious?

I still think there needs to be a legitimate way to spend less than 95% of the cap so that clubs with crap lists aren't forced to pay their players the same as the premiers.

I understand it is part of the players CBA but there is no reason why clubs can't spend as little as they want and then pay the remaining "cap space" into a central fund that is divided and shared by all 720 players equally at the end of the season.

The players then get the exact amount of their CBA (no underpaying).

No clubs are forced to pay overs to a crap list.

Poor on field clubs have more salary room to chase other players.

No club can "save money" by skimping on player payments.

As all clubs are forced to pay 100% each year, it will create a bigger driving force to spend on players to improve on field.

Surely this is really obvious?

Good point. Teams like Melbourne are probably paying way overs to mediocre players because they don't have enough good players to be paying higher amounts to. This will probably create a problem when they get a bunch of really good players and have to tell the overpaid mediocre players they are getting significant pay cuts back to what they are really worth.

 

I reckon set the salary cap based on ladder position.

Hawks get $1million as their cap, 18th placed team gets $18million.

Maximum 1 year contracts allowed for all players.

The end.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.