Clark is welcome to nothing as far as i am concerned.

"I'm cured..." Just in time for the draft

Yeah right....

As an observation, he was an AA player when he had a good defence around him and a decent midfield (Jamar and Beamer led the league in hit outs to advantage for example). He didn't have a good defence or midfield at the Dees for the past couple of years and at the Hawks he played without their first choice defence or midfield. So maybe he plays OK when he has other good players around him. Wouldn't be the first and often what I say about a lot of players

quote]

Like Colin Sylvia.

Col is surrounded by good players now and.....??

Clark is welcome to nothing as far as i am concerned.

"I'm cured..." Just in time for the draft

Yeah right....

More like " I need to be drafted to a better club to be cured...."

Not that I am cynical. It's a terrible disease....

I went down to Launceston and watched the game, Frawley was pretty awful made some noticeable blunders, he will play better when Hawthorn have their full team playing, he looks good in the gold and brown.

He will be forced to handball more. As Crawford said, he will be the next Simon Taylor at Hawthorn.

His shocking decision making and execution will be buffered a little as he will have class around him and clear gut-running options up ahead.

The one-or-two that knew Frawley was overrated junk, even as he accepted the AA honour, knew footy, and know footy. The rest, listen to SEN and regurgitate junk with retrospective wisdom.

Mitch Clark is different. He has a great pair of mitts. You could have put any forward in any era in our forward line circa Neeld, with long-bomb Maloney pumping it 60m in the air and 40m forward....and our ultra-slow boundary hugging ball movement. We allowed the opposition to gang up on him 3 to 1 many times. Clark did better than anyone could have.