I did not see the AFL mentioned as an arbiter of law in Australia

I did not see any case law by Judge Caroline Wilson

And I have never seen the name Dwayne Russell on any Australian Lawyers register.

It's called evidence folks, and evidence that must be tested in a recognised court of law under oath.

This Kangaroo court stuff by Wilson, Russell and others must be taken on by the Silks who represent the MFC. Either they shut up with their constant persecution of this club or face the consequences in a civil court.

Well one CW has been much less vocal these past few days, in fact she hasn't been sighted in the Age newspaper since her extremely personal piece in Saturday's paper.

I did not see the AFL mentioned as an arbiter of law in Australia

............

Neither are the Racing Industry Bodies, but they have enormous power within their industry.

Mono - All these bodies have their own internal procedures and conditions of employment like any employer, however the law is the law and that's why we have civil courts and unfair dismissal laws. The AFL is not beyond the laws of this land and they will need to tread very carefully if they go after people unless they have firm evidence. A good Silk worth their salt will open them up.

Mono - All these bodies have their own internal procedures and conditions of employment like any employer, however the law is the law and that's why we have civil courts and unfair dismissal laws. The AFL is not beyond the laws of this land and they will need to tread very carefully if they go after people unless they have firm evidence. A good Silk worth their salt will open them up.

Danny Nickolic might beg to differ. From what was published, he was 'convicted' after a hearing where it was his word against another. Go figure.