I was interested to compare Round 2 versus Round 15, for no purpose other than curiosity.

Really this is only the very top layer of info, but it should kick things off well enough if people want to delve further.

Food for thought!

===================

WB IN (5): 3 Andrejs Everitt, 1 Farren Ray, 40 Jarrod Harbrow, 10 Nathan Eagleton, 35 Stephen Tiller

WB OUT (5): 28 Scott Welsh, 7 Scott West, 19 Shaun Higgins, 33 Tim Callan, 16 Ryan Griffen

===================

Melbourne IN (9):

39 Austin Wonaeamirri, 17 Chris A. Johnson, 40 Mark Jamar, 6 Matthew Bate,

37 Matthew Warnock, 45 Matthew Whelan, 29 Michael Newton, 44 Shane Valenti, 33 Stefan Martin

Melbourne OUT (9):

36 Aaron Davey, 5 Brock McLean, 9 David Neitz, 28 Isaac Weetra, 43 Jace Bode,

23 James McDonald, 34 Jeff White, 41 Nathan Carroll, 24 Russell Robertson

===================

Rnd 2........2.4 2.5, 5.8 9.9, 7.9 18.13, 9.12 24.17 (21ss vs 41ss) 95 point loss

Rnd 15......1.0 3.2, 4.2 7.4, 5.6 12.7 , 9.10 14.11 (19ss vs 25ss) 31 point loss

===================

Rnd 2 Goal kickers:

WB: Murphy 4, Johnson 3, Hill 3, Akermanis 3, Welsh 3, Cross 3, Hahn, Gilbee, Giansiracusa, Griffen, Wight.

Melbourne: Neitz 2, Robertson 2, White 2, Jones, Green, Davey.

Rnd 15 Goal kickers:

WB: Akermanis 3, Minson 3, Hahn 2, Eagleton 2, Giansiracusa 2, Cross, Harbrow.

Melbourne: Miller 3, Green 2, Buckley, Dunn, C Johnson, Newton.

===================

Match Reports:

Rnd 2: http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfmatchre...792.html?page=2

Rnd 15: http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/matchrepo...474.html?page=2

Interesting, but I'd rather not compare.............losses.

Interesting, but I'd rather not compare.............losses.

Fair enough - seems others agree Oh well, nothing to see here .. move along.

One thing I think was really positive is that we kept the Dogs to their lowest score of the year. We also did this without sacrificing much of our own scoring power. Indeed, we only scored a few less that last time.

One thing I think was really positive is that we kept the Dogs to their lowest score of the year. We also did this without sacrificing much of our own scoring power. Indeed, we only scored a few less that last time.

There's always a positive.........