Jump to content

Satyriconhome

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Satyriconhome

  1. If you think that fine, you are entitled to your opinion, we'll see how the trade period pans out, and then we can all play the usual game of Demonland Kings of Hindsight
  2. Unfortunately neither of you are part of Essendon's trade week team, if we land Hibberd it will be a deal that is suitable to both clubs, nobody foresaw that the EFC players would be banned, it was supposedly done and dusted, Port must feel exactly the same about Ryder
  3. Gee......the conspiracy theory is alive and well on Demonland....it is trade week, all clubs have a list and what they would like to get/offer, that is why trade 'week' lasts so long, negotiation
  4. No, that was my point that there will be more than one offer between the clubs, both will go away and look at all scenarios, I would be very surprised if the deal ended up as just one pick
  5. So you would be happy to burn a player who has nominated us as his club of choice, [censored] off the new coach coz he is the one who has obviously pushed out the boat for Hibberd, just to prove we have a bigger dick at the trade table?
  6. So to become a destination club......we burn a player to make a point that we won't be messed with at the trade table
  7. If you think that is how negotiation during trade week happens then you must be a bit naive, I am not the expert, but I have had conversations with people who have been directly involved in trade week, but I am also not that naive to think we would say take it or leave it
  8. Straight bat, back down the wicket, word for word what Mahoney said
  9. You can bet your bottom dollar we have put more than next years 2nd round pick on the table, just to see how it falls, you really think we would say next years 2nd round pick or it doesn't happen, wouldn't surprise me if there were two or three scenarios on the table, including this years 2nd round pick and other picks etc
  10. I understand negotiation, we have given them two alternatives, so what you think is going to happen is Essendon will 'panic' and accept the next year pick? They have the player who wants to move to MFC, and we supposedly want the player, it doesn't necessarily mean it will actually happen the way we want it to, I think the negotiation is on equal footing
  11. I think you are over thinking this, it is not a curve ball, we have given them two scenarios, will be up to them to decide which one they would like to go with, I am sure we have a plan either way, Hibberd wants to be at MFC and not Essendon, something will be worked out and quite quickly I would have thought
  12. Satyriconhome replied to Cards13's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Each to their own HT, Lynch leaves me cold, bit too much cerebral masturbation for my liking
  13. Satyriconhome replied to Cards13's post in a topic in General Discussion
    HT - I can't begin to tell you how far you have fallen in my estimation with that bolded statement above...American sheeesh
  14. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I always find it funny with the delistings etc, bumped into both Roh Bail and James Strauss this year, both happy in their lives without footy And then there is Cam Johnston a rookie from a few years ago, had quite a few chats to him, follow him on Twitter, now punter with Ohio State, playing regularly in front of 50000 each weekend I think justice is served most times
  15. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes, but it is the past, I get bored with MFC supporters continually looking over their shoulders, hopefully we have moved on. It a new season, these are the first 3 guys who have had to make way as we try and move forward again, like we have moved slowly forward since 2013. I am looking forward to the new season, even upgraded my membership, but think the guys deserve to be thanked in a thread like this, with a minimum of negativity, we all know why they were delisted
  16. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The reason they were on that list and one was captain, was they went out and gave everything they could during a very dark period for the club, which they should be thanked for, but if you feel the need to blow raspberries who am I to stop you
  17. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Does that mean from your memory banks, coz you are like me and you need the space for new information OD
  18. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He didn't make a direct comparison between Jack Grimes and Brent Harvey, he said North Melbourne-ish ie delisting 4 'favourite' players in one hit and in a rather clumsy way, his opinion , a lot of supporters, myself included, have great respect for Jack Grimes the person, myself from the many conversations I have had with him, I am sorry to see him go, but understand why the club has done it from a footy point of view
  19. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He is still with us till Oct 31 officially, so like Fitzy a club can give us a 4th or 5th round pick, should they choose, gives Jack the opportunity to talk to everybody.....whoops he is a free agent....forgot
  20. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
  21. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Agree with your sentiments, nicely put, hopefully the trolls will behave themselves now they have their wish
  22. Satyriconhome replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It's the grassy knoll logic that is sometimes prevalent on this board.
  23. Satyriconhome replied to 45HG's post in a topic in Other Sports
    That would be once to much for me, they wear the wrong colour blue
  24. You are joking right, you need to get out more I do remember the dishwashing/washing liquid as well, maybe now that's high octane petrol?
  25. Exactly, and you don't have to agree with it, like I don't agree with others, nobody knows who is right or wrong because of the whole schamozzle being handled the way it was,. Only joined this thread to say whatever has happened in the past is exactly that and Melksham should be treated like the rest on the list, with a clean slate, but Colonel Blimp joined in with his non construcive two or three word posts. Thankfully what followed was robust debate, others have said let's move on so let's do that Used the name because that particular poster only seems to understand that particular type of post