Rossmillan
Life Member-
Posts
269 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
2,814 profile views
Rossmillan's Achievements
Demon (2/10)
589
Reputation
-
Presser for the crows. What a class individual, absolutely respectful way to answer the questions about your former club.
-
Was actually a great game of footy, huge clunks end to end, with speed on the ball. Unfortunately as a redlegs supporter the result didn’t go our way.
-
Can’t under estimate the value of dominant crowd support
-
Was that Tomlinson sitting next to Davis? Great kick Jordan
-
$350k - is that per year? Holy Moses no wonder everyone wants to be a bloody influencer. For full transparency I have unfollowed him on instagram and he can have my viewership back when he puts the Melbourne jumper back on. I understand that players have a limited career, but does his influence will slowly fade as soon he is no longer a footy player? but in 10,20,30 years time is he going to regret not coming to premiership reunions because he burnt his team mates?
-
Trac is 28 nearly 29, recovering from a serious injury. I still don’t have enough info, but I can see why selling high - IF he doesn’t want to be there - makes sense. Pickett on the other hand is 23, about to hit is prime, I just can’t see any value in trading him for picks. If we did it would be a huge loss, similar to losing Jackson, simply a player that you never really replace.
-
Just wondering how that conversation goes “Hey Charlie (cornrow), sounds like petracca may want to come here, how would you like to go to Melbourne?” Nup ”Hey Harry, Charlie said no, but how about you go to Melbourne instead” Nup At least this whole mess might cause some trouble at Carlton - haha
-
This is the same Tex Walker who sooked it up at Jake Lever leaving the crows. No Thanks.
-
That future second rounder for McAdam hasn’t aged well has it.
-
I really like what we saw with Windsor this year, let’s use pick 5 to get another gem like him.
- 481 replies
-
- 19
-
I read it that it was the opinion of the board that trying to nominate to be on the board without being asked would be considered by them “adversarial”. Nominations are allowed it’s just they didn’t like it.
-
Really? It seems to me all he wanted was a reasonable chance to put forward a case to the voting members as to why he would be a better candidate. He was not given that chance. I don’t know the bloke, but it sure seems like all he asked for was a democratic election process. I read the judgement and it sure seems like his requests were fair and reasonable.
-
What a great retirement speech! Well done sir, pure class!
-
Why 2 years seems more than reasonable for both parties?
-
Can we have a discussion about centre clearances. I concede that there is nuances around centre clearance, that mean winning every centre clearance isn’t necessary, especially if the opposition kick dirty ball in that we can intercept and slingshot from. But I don’t think it’s any coincidence that the first quarter saw us win some centre clearance, get territory and then lock it in with pressure resulting in a fairly dominant quarter. Post 1st quarter The Giants then were able to get on top in the middle. This is a repeat pattern that opposition is winning clearance but are getting cleaner entries than we would like, putting our defence under way too much pressure. I can concede we have had injuries, But we have the premier ruckman in the comp and our midfield cattle is good. Is this an Yze vs Mcqualter thing or what is going on in the centre clearances.