Willmoy1947

You are giving an excuse of just about a whole years stuff ups by umpires You cannot change rule interpretation on a week to week basis just to appease crowds,players or AFL ratbags including media. OR obviously results. If you can then there is something much more serious going on here...

It doesn't have to be a conspiracy to be openly cheating. Where the conspiracy is planted, is before the start of the season. Where idle talk on players fairness is discussed along with perhaps favourite players and Clubs, or even interpretation of new/old /hard rules. I know I know, what else are they going to dis cuss....how many frees they give against teams they don't like or players they do. That could not have anything to do with it, could it.

Watch Cox sometime when your not busy, maggots. You might be surprised. If you, or any opposition player are within a metre and a half of him in a play on situation you will probably have been kicked,pulled or pushed.

What's the average number of trips per game, not picked up. Would it be ten or twenty? Anyone know? Now that we allow pushing and pushing into head contact, holding the ball while pirouetting, pushing players into the fence while outside the boundary, I reckon it's all good with that result.

David used to give his occasional wack behind play as well

No

Tell you now. Melksham will be here.

There's a couple of popular sentences, right there

A great player, and I was watching his genuine delight in being with genuine people especially the kids. He spreads his time for the enjoyment of others. He is a credit to his Club, and apparently a character.

Sadistical logic.

It won't be happening if at all until after the next six games. We beat FIRST AND SECOND with these boys and should have beaten third. What's the rush....

From what was heard Mitch will not be at 7 next year along with a few older stalwarts.

In view of what could have been viewed beforehand, similar contact instances, I totally agree.

Should we be satisfied with just three weeks? Should our maggot Media be satisfied with such a light sentence for such an attack to a Premiership Player? Is this type of sly follow up chop to be regarded henceforth as a blow of intent, albeit furtive.

If it was bloody Danger, or someone from North or one of the Bobbsy Twins, it would be splashed all over the Maggot Media. Cam Mooney wouldn't be saying it was just an unavoidable brush past in the game.