damienjr

Yes

Will George be joining you this week? Have missed him over the past month.

Every week, I watch with frustration as Tracc bombs the ball forward. Over the years, you can count on one hand how many times he has short passed to a teammate who might be in a better position. That being said, he did one on Saturday. Have you seen this? To me, he's still following the old gameplan.

And here lies the dilemma. If we end up bottom 2 or even bottom 4 and acknowledge that we are in a rebuild phase, do we offload these 2 champions and get their salaries off our books, or do we just hold onto them because we believe we won't get "fair value" for them? The worst-case scenario is that we will finish middle of the road and still think we have a top 4 list.

Sicily does a good job as a swingman. May would be good at it as well.

Thanks Gater. Did McAdem participate in the sim?

This is awkward.

You raise an interesting question, primarily about whether other clubs have track watchers who post on their social media pages. I looked at several clubs, including the three you named, and I could not find any supporter forums similar to Demonland, let alone track watchers covering training. There is very little out there. It appears we are unique and blessed to have a platform like this and how it is set up, where information can be shared so readily.

I know what you mean, and I would have preferred a little more, but I suppose it would look awkward if our draftees and the public knew they were not our first choice. Nevertheless, JT was aware that a camera was present and probably knew that it would be uploaded to the website following the draft; he could have reviewed and ranked the top ten draftees and where they would probably land, and any discussion regarding preferences could have been removed. That said, what we saw was good content but it left the viewers wanting more.

I agree.

Geez Luci, it was just an observation from a couple of track watchers who went out of their way to report back to you guys. The comments made were no different from what other track watchers observe about other players at training in Melbourne. You don't need to shame people because you don't agree with what was said. You weren't there.

They could use Langdon as a high forward as the ANB replacement and have Windsor, Lindsay and Bowie compete for the wings.

Settle down pal. Only talking about that we should be ok if Tracc chooses to leave.

His strengths/weaknesses were well documented in the lead-up to the draft. I saw most of them on display at training yesterday. He is tall. Almost the same height as JVR. Almost 2" taller than Tracc. Although not super quick, he was able to run 40-50m to receive a handball from a player who had just marked and kick it 30m to another leading player. He has a good level of fitness. He loves a contest. He has a penetrating left foot that can hit targets 40-50m out. Some missed as the session wore on. Lovely one-grab mark, although I did not see him take a contested mark. His quiet demeanour gives him an air of self-confidence and a knowing that he belongs. If by chance we sadly lose Christian, Harvey will be well qualified to take over that role. Throw in 2 first-round picks, and I feel that we will be OK.

So any observations made by track watchers on players, whether good or not so good, are distorted by "confirmation bias"? Or does this only apply to comments regarding Tracc?