-
Posts
12,451 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by La Dee-vina Comedia
-
On Twitter a few minutes ago: .@3AWNeilMitchell has a tip-off that Jack Watts has agreed to stay at @melbournefc. Neil's been right about Roos and new president #goodmail
-
six delisted at Collingwood including Jolly, Didak, Krakouer and some lesser knowns
-
2014 Melbourne Skipper...who should it be??
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to Deemolition's topic in Melbourne Demons
I like all the above dot points but want to add three more: must not be an introvert must be a confident public speaker, particularly in the media must be capable of representing the MFC well off field, such as in meetings with sponsors I don't know who meets all the above. -
I would have thought we would be contractually obligated to keep the Webjet logo visible for the term of the contract. I don't know when it's due to finish, but if we are still within the contract timeframe, we should still be promoting their brand for them.
-
Colin Sylvia is yet to decide if he will remain at Melbourne
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to Romey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Somewhat appropriate that a ventriloquist's dummy represents an anonymous poster. Must find one for myself. -
Most sport autobiographies are trite and inane. But if Neil Craig were to write one I suspect it would be a humdinger - honest, direct and informative. I'd love to read what he thinks about the last two years.
-
My Heart Beats True - 2014 Membership Campaign Launched
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to Demonland's topic in Melbourne Demons
I recall that Collingwood chose to use 'Side by side' as a membership slogan because the phrase polled well with members*. I wonder whether we did any research when coming up with this slogan? I like it a lot. (Of course, 'side by side' is what they are familiar with as that's how the courts place multiple defendants in the dock) -
Colin Sylvia is yet to decide if he will remain at Melbourne
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to Romey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Jon Ralph's article doesn't even bother to name a club which might potentially be interested. Has there been any scuttlebut which might suggest which clubs, if any, have been sniffing around Sylvia? Otherwise, it just looks like Ralph has looked at (1) Roos appointed, so need a Melbourne story (2) who's a free agent who could leave Melbourne? -
The difference is just mind blowing
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to Soidee's topic in Melbourne Demons
Is it reasonable to conclude that teams that don't have A-grade off-field talent don't have it on-field either? I've posted before that I can't believe that there was not the potential of an A-grade player in the last 100 or so we've drafted. Both Watts and Trengove were considered by the market prior to their drafting as being premium talent. Perhaps now with an A-grade CEO and an A-grade coach we'll see which players are actually A-grade. -
We've got an early draft pick which Essendon might want. But Essendon's tradeable players are likely to be key position players like Gumbleton or Pears. So which team with excess mids and a shortage of talls wants to join the party for a three way swap? I would have thought GWS, Bulldogs or maybe Carlton?
-
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
There's a thread somewhere on Demonland asking whether 2013 was our worst season ever. Not any more. -
I agree that up until now Watts hasn't shown that he could be a midfielder. But that was when we had sub-standard coaching and development. It's possible he may never make a midfielder but he has the speed and the skills - just needs to get hardness and desire (and probably a higher level of fitness). In short, I'm hopeful that under this new regime players will improve in so many ways. Watts improving to be a quality midfielder is my main individual hope.
-
He wants to keep Watts. I wonder whether he'll try to turn him into a midfielder? I like that idea.
-
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
Thank goodness it's been announced. I was worried I was going to vote for Paul Roos above the line in the Senate tomorrow. What a waste that would have been. He has much more important work to do than that. -
Can't quite see how this would work. If a player has a reason to be concerned about in infraction notice, would another club want that player? if a player has no reason to be concerned, why would they leave Essendon?
-
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS Enough said -
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
What's wrong with everyone? Where's the WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS thread? -
NEW DEMONLAND BANNER
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to The Song Formerly Known As's topic in Melbourne Demons
No need for excuses. Great job. -
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
Demonland currently has 534 users browsing this Forum. Wonder why? -
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
Would a suspended sentence help? -
I just hope it's not "Melbourne Bitter". It's too descriptive.
-
WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to timmyo64's topic in Melbourne Demons
That's not what I heard. -
I'm a bit worried the AFL's grand plan is to merge us with North Melbourne and call us the Melbourne Roos.
-
Hogan Vs Daniher Vs Boyd Vs Patton
La Dee-vina Comedia replied to PartyTimeJohnny's topic in Melbourne Demons
The scoring for leadership seems somewhat bizarre. Gary Ablett Sr would have been marked down on this score as would have Gary Ablett Jr when he was an 18-20 year old and I suspect Dustin Fletcher, Robert Harvey and other introverted players. So we wouldn't pick any of them because of this? Such nonsense. -
I think it should be scrapped anyway - but while the scheme exists, I suspect we'll be the beneficiary this year. My suspicion is that we might get something conditional as a form of priority pick, such as the rights to a 17 year old which we can only trade. In that way, this year's draft is not compromised and although it compromises next year's draft, by then everyone will have forgotten.