binman

Seriously low bar, but agree.

I just had lunch, but could fit a donut in. So i'd estimate i'm at 97% capacity.

Please refer to the post above.

Of course you did. You had the Flower magic working for you. Smooth as silk.

True, but going forward was his last chance saloon. If it didn't work out as a forward i have no doubt he would have been dropped. Possibly for good. Turned the ball over way too often, in part because of poor field kicking, and in part because he often went for high risk, high reward kicks beyond his ability that usually rewarded the opposition. And he was also prone to frost like exploratory runs up the field, albeit at a much slower pace. In fact Tmac was the prototype Frost.

I signed up to the the possibility Brown, Weed, Tmac and Jackson could work idea But also signed up to the it is unlikely the club would run with it idea. I would like to formally resign and remove my signature from the Brown, Weed, Tmac and Jackson could work idea. And 15 minutes into the North game i signed up to the brown and weed must never play in the same team club. Lets see how Brown goes on the more open spaces of the g - and to be fair it was his first game in a new system after a long lay off (and he did kick 2 goals - and set up a couple more up!) - but I have to say i was a little underwhelmed and i wonder if Weed might not be a better option. He's not the most mobile of cats is he.

I'm not sure he is the right option. I don't think he is great one on one, and his go his is running of half back and metres gained. Medium/small goal kickers is our Achilles heel defensively since Jetts lost a yard of pace. And Papley just about the best in the business. I reckon Hibbo is the go. Strong enough to beat him one on one and fast enough to go with him on lead. And after locking down Dusty is in the right headspace for the job. And as bonus, i don't think it would need to be hard lockdown as Papley doesn't get that many possessions. keep him quiet and limit his output to a couple of goals and job done. Also they will be loathe to make more than one change to the backline i suspect so i can't see them brining in Jetts or another small defender.. Ultimately Lockhart is the go you'd think.

Yep. Coincidentally i just posted in the changes thread that Petty and tommo both trained over preseason as the lockdown full back. Both started the preseason in the frame for that role. Tommo won the spot because of a super preseason. And I think petty also had a slight interruption. As fantastic has tommo has been - and I could not be more impressed - im confident petty will be his equal. He is a serious foorballer. It is awful to have lost tommo. Particularly for tommo obviously. But we are incredibly fortunate to have a player to replace him given how important the role is from a structural perspective.

Petty and tommo both trained over preseason as the lockdown full back. Both started the preseason in the frame for that role. Tommo won the spot because of a super preseason. And I think petty also had a slight interruption. Tmac was great down back yesterday. But he is not, and has never been a deep lock down defender. Petty will now take the role.

Nailed it. Sparrow was a class above in the vfl. I don't think baker will make it. Petty is a lock for Tomlinson's role. And we won't lose anything either. Petty is a gun and will slot in beautifully. Heartbreaking for thommo.

I don't think that's true actually. At least not all the time. Those teams, and the lions all had lots of scrappy wins against bottom sides, tbe dees amongst them. Tbe tigers are probably a better comparison, given they are the equal of those power teams, and they are contemporaries. The tigers often win by 3 or 4 goals against bottom teams.

I'm not. I hope he plays exactly the re he has all year. And I suspect he will.

100% EO. Its a fool errand to eqate success in this game as thrashing them. Just as it was for the hawks game. The only metric I care about is tbe four points. Serios teams bank this win. Ugly or scrappy makes no difference. I'm super pleased they have only made the one change. That is the mindset I want to see.

'The only danger games are those played and lost in the mind' Sir Alex Ferguson (Not really)

'Every successful summit is built on three foundation stones - hard work, preparation and planning. But there is a fourth, more elusive element - good luck. And it is an element, that unlike its evil twin bad luck, will only appear with the three foundation stones in place' Old Tibetan saying as told to and translated by Sir Edmund Hilary. We have the foundation stones in place. And we are having some good luck - eg opponents having injuries and suspension and/or having tough games before us, us having a good run with injuries jones' 300 falling on Anzac eve Tgis week we have another little bit of luck. It would be easy and perhaps understandable for the players intensity to drop a bit this week. But there is a rare prize for a win - the top of the ladder after seven rounds (By the by i made that quote up)

Leaving aside the Jones discussion, I understand keeping Melksham in. I was a huge critic of him last year. His lack of pressure and leadership were damning in my book. He was pretty average against the tigers, but his pressure was better. Not great, but better. Possibly the best kick in the team. And has great vision. As a permanent half forward (with the occasional run in the middle) he can be a real weapon. And in that role he doesn't need heaps if the ball. With everything else clicking he can be icing on the cake. A difference maker. And another match up headache as you have to put a decent defender on him - possibly the player you might also consider for fritter.

Agree. But also the way we used our handballs was different. We used long handballs to get it away from the contest, almost like a shirt kick. But that won't stop King saying something like: 'See i told you the handball game Melbourne employed, you know the fundamental change to their game plan i pointed out, would break down under the tigers finals pressure'

Fair comment. But I reckon it has been ok tgis season. In large part because he's not trying anything too cute, which was his big issue as a defender. Been kicking short or for distance, and generally down the line. Tmac is almost playing as a second winger already. Lots of marks and possessions are up around the wings and both flanks. No issue with Brown coming in terms of tbe two playing together.

The tigers dogs game is a fascinating game from a tactical perspective. Two distinct approaches. I have tipped the tigers because I suspect their pressure will disrupt the dog's high in close handball/throw game. I hope it does, because ot will be our blueprint too to beat team

Teams will definitely start trying to find a way to reduce the impact of our intercept marking, particularly lever, just as we did to the tigers. But I'm not sure about tagging as such. It's a big call to basically give up one player to tag a player, even more so when that player is a defender. I reckon our defensive structure is quite different to the tigers. And less susceptible to mitigation strategies like the one aob highlights (use of handballs etc). Also i reckon a lot of our intercepts come post losing a clearnce as opposed to transition. That is hard to stop, other than not actually going forward from a clearance. Which would be a win for us. Catch 22

Exactly right AOB. But we also exploited that gap with a lot of short, low risk kicks. Low risk because they were short, so more chance hitting them. But critically they were generally along the boundary line, so if the possessions chain were broken it often went over the boundary line and we got stoppage (giving us the chance to set up defensively AND take advantage of our two dominant rucks). And if the tigers won possession it less likely to be in the corridor. I reckon Langdon has really improved his kicking this year, which is important as it is often him kicking down the boundary line (and Gus on the other side). But Salem is super important wit this kick. And i think Jordon is really important in this regard too. Very reliable kick who often goes short. It's interesting actually because i think (but admittedly don't have the evidence) we are playing much more along the boundary line all over the ground than we have previously. Think of how often we kick to the pockets in our forward line. And as noted above along the boundary line in transition. We still sometime use the corridor to attack but i suspect we are using it much less than in previous seasons. Again i don't have the evidence, but also i don't think we are crossing/switching as often. Which would make sense because we are playing through Max wherever possible. And less switching would probably create more predicable transition patterns (and i reckon they have tried to be more predictable in lots of other ways - something Tomlinson alluded to i think, in his footy show interview that is on the MFC website - ie that we have simplified our game plan).

And we made that line. By two goals. Bananas

100s of people would know. Extremely unlikely it has come from the club. Would you still be upset if it was 'leaked' by his second cousin?

Nor is Huge contract offered to petracca. He has gone from one of the best players in tbe AFL. To one of the best 5, arguably 3. Max must be in the conversation for top 5 too.

I was actually thinkin the same thing. An own goal