Brocky

Jamar did kick 5 and achieved it with having a varying times beside him in the forward line.....Spencer and McLean. Unless Jamar took the mark which he did on 5 occassions it was an automatic turnover to the Carlton opposition. They ran the ball so easily out of our forward line that it was farcical It was hardly pressure tactics by Bailey.

Is having two giraffe's and a turtle in your forward line tanking though?

Another mid-sized forward, yep, just what we need!!

Very good question TM.

I do not know and as no one has answered it would suggest he is not in Melbourne.

There was no report on him anywhere in Media as being there.

All suggest he is not in Melbourne at present.

He was there.

O'Meara would likely be pick 1 or 2 next year. I'm talking about the effective worth of the trade.

If you're thinking literally, it is first round compo pick + mid-first round compo pick for first pick of the under 17s.

Ah ok, absolutely agree.

The question is, would you trade our 2 compo picks in 2012 for pick 1/2 in 2012?

ie, would you trade pick 11 and 12 for pick 2?

I would. I'd be willing to pay a bit more too.

But who is going to have Pick 1/2 in 2012?

Who owns Sports News First?

Paul Connors owns part of it doesn't he?

Range Rover are you skiing?

I'd like to commend the AFL on their fixturing this year. Giving Melbourne a bye, then an interstate 'home' game at the height of the ski season is most welcome. We can head to Buller for 2-3 weeks and catch our 'home' game on tv from our chalets.

Scoop Junior wants to and if Mrs. Redleg has no objections I will be there. You can tell who runs my home. Will probably bring KC from Casey if I come and then also WJ will most likely tag along.

In that case, I think I will make my first appearance at Casey for 2011. See you there Fan and Redleg.

Petterd's word wasn't unreasonable ?

His word may have been unreasonable, but what was Ricky referring to? Maybe he disagreed with who was kicked off MasterChef that night?

Redleg, what are the grounds for an appeal against a tribunal ruling?

My understanding is that there has to be some new evidence introduced upon which an appeal can be based.

I understand what you are saying Jack, but I disagree.

If the AFL have set rules around when you can and can't appeal and that restricts the MFC from appealing in this case, I would have thought we could take the case to The Court of Arbitration for Sport on the basis that Jack did not receive a fair hearing.

Couldn't agree more Redleg.

The tribunal chairman instructed the jury to take into account the conduct, not the consequence. I don't see how they did that when they came to this verdict. That is grounds to appeal, as is the 4 minute deliberation. I don't see how he got a fair hearing.

I reckon the negligent part is gone for sure. The rest I'm not sure of, hard because Dangerfield was concussed.

It isn't required, if it isn't negligent, it's accidental, therefore no case to answer.

If I remember correctly, Dangerfield was hit heavily in a marking contest prior to the Trengove tackle. Isn't it possible he was already suffering some form of concussion from that, yet came back on the ground?

Now she's a mother, has her value gone up or down?

Given she had a boy, down, as there won't be an opportunity to make use of the mother\daughter rule in 18 years time.

Yeah, except that:

1- the girl is Miranda Kerr,

2- she hasn't said that she's breaking up with you, nor has she given any indication of it,

3- she's already committed to having sex with you for the rest of the season,

4- she's given no indication that she won't continue to have sex with you for the rest of your life,

5- your next girlfriend is unlikely to be Miranda Kerr, and

6- it's Miranda Kerr.

So you'd break up with Miranda Kerr just because you got paranoid and confronted her about accusing her of cheating on you without any evidence, simply because some jealous guy from West Sydney started a rumour that she's cheating on you.

So I assume that you're real name isn't Orlando Bloom.

Great analogy Bob!!

both North Melbourne and the demons will lose 2 of our young players each.

Your story lacks credibility, as GWS can only take one player from each club.

My link

A 'sick joke' huh?

Eat. My. Shorts.

Can you point me to the part of the article that quotes or even references an MFC source? I notice the word 'likely' and we were mentioned only because we went after Hale. It looks to me like this journo has made it all up. If we wanted a player of Hansen's type, we would have kept Brad Miller. You can keep your shorts.

i know we have a lot of mids.. but how can you pass on Atley???

Another 9 clubs passed on him as well....................

Hopefully the Chip is ok as I was in the rooms after the game and he was on crutches. *GULP*

How did you get from Chip on crutches to him having a broken toe?

Walker's one looked terrible, but there is no doubt he tried to pull out. He arguably should have lowered his body, so it might have been reckless, but it was certainly not deliberate. I am often critical of the MRP, but they got it right this time.

Agreed. Walker was trying, but that crap they call turf at that stadium meant he couldn't pull up. Have a look at the turf moving as he tried to stop.

Out: The prancing prima-donnas (field, goal and boundary).

In: Anyone with an IQ that has reached double figures.

According to a caller to radio, we complained to the AFL during the week about the umpires' uniform only to be told it was bad luck and had already been decided. Hardly surprising when you have muppets running the joint.

What a joke. Leave the awareness raising to the clubs, there was no need for those prancing prima-donnas to be put in pink. I'm sure they all already wear pink shirts during the week when they are out and about on commercial rd, surely they could have spent their Friday night in yellow.

They must have got the idea while sharing Visy Park with Carlton.

It doesn't really matter what you think of Malthouse, a coach cannot say what he said to an opposition player, regardless of that players history.

Where did Martin and McNamara play?

Did Miller play? Where?

Maric?

Does Watts look like a starter for Demons as soon as next week??

Martin started forward, went back, then finished forward. McNamara played back, I didn't think he was best for Casey.

Miller forward, no good.

Maric foward, kicked a nice goal but was ordinary.

Watts was good but doubt he will play for the demons next week.