Nasher

38 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

What pick did we give up?

Please tell me it wasn't a 2nd rounder?

It hasn’t been done yet!

Gone the early crow a bit with the title change haven’t we @Demonland ?

Anyone remember Chris Judd’s grandmother?

7 hours ago, bing181 said:

If the Suns lose 7 & 8 for Petracca, they'll need picks.

Though that's not the point. If Humphrey wants out and then nominates the Hawks, the Suns and Hawks will have to thrash out a deal. Which will be picks.

The Humphrey can’t get to Hawthorn conclusion is based on an assumption that we won’t trade Trac for only pics. If you can’t come at that assumption (and it’s completely valid not to), you’re just going to keep talking in circles with everyone.

It’s important because it means in the Humphrey to Hawthorn scenario, Gold Coast still have picks 7 and 8 (because Melbourne have walked on the Petracca deal) so any pick Hawthorn has on offer is worthless to them. It’s the same as receiving nothing at all. They might as well keep Humphrey for another year and risk it again next year. He might walk then too, but they’ll have had another year of his services in the mean time.

Petracca and Humphrey are both on long term contracts, so neither club HAS to trade their player; holding them to their contracts is an option. Both clubs are trying to get maximum salvage value for a player they don’t want to lose.

If Humphrey nominates Hawthorn, Gold Coast will tell him it’s Melbourne or serve out his contract. He ain’t going to Hawthorn.

2 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Top 10 pick this year, 1st rounder next year, 2nd rounder this year and next. Offload Cam McKenzie if necessary. More than enough to get it done if they want.

What they have in stock for the Merrett trade can just be shifted to GC for BH if they really wanted him.

It’s not a thing, TJF. Gold Coast want Trac. Hawthorn don’t have Trac. I think it’s that simple.

If GC sell Humphrey to Hawthorn, we walk on the Trac deal. Then they go in to 2026 with no Humphrey and no Petracca - in a season they’re priming for a flag push. They have no motivation to deal with Hawthorn.

50 minutes ago, doomsday dee said:

He ain't going to the eagles,Goody and haven't heard about King

So why crack it and leave over what Goody said? Goody’s opinion doesn’t mean squat anymore. That’s why I was interested in what King said.

Anyway, all water under the bridge now. I don’t understand but I also don’t have to.

51 minutes ago, doomsday dee said:

3 talls,3 smalls,one small has to defend and it ain't Bowie(to small) or Salem(to slow)so it would be another year defending or change clubs

So he’d prefer to go to West Coast and be the first choice attacking HBF in a team that gets spanked each week?

When “Melbourne” lied to him, who specifically told him he’d play a role he didn’t play? And how did the conversation with King go?

18 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

I’m so pleased with the positive comments on here. I was dreading reading this thread but needn’t have been. Seems almost everyone is embracing this appointment 🥳

It’s only been a couple of hours, we’re still kicking the tyres, but to anyone who’s receiving this news with negative thoughts please consider this…

I was arguably Goody’s #1 fan. I was shattered when he was sacked and couldn’t imagine warming to any other coach. At the time I despised the new coach and I didn’t even know who it was, such was my heartbreak. So…

If I can get behind our new coach from day dot, anyone can. And not just get behind him but support him and have full trust in him, welcome him wholeheartedly.

Here’s the thing… he’s our coach whether folks like it or not. B!tcching and moaning won’t change that.

Before his appointment, when the interviews were still underway, of course there were negative and positive comments about all the candidates and that’s perfectly normal. But the nanosecond Steven was given the job, the negativity needs to stop because it immediately becomes unproductive and a waste of time and energy. It won’t change anything.

GOOD LUCK KINGY!!!

Well put. I had a period of mourning for Goody too, but now I’m embracing it.

We’ve got a well-credentialed coach; arguably the best on paper of the untried coaches on the market. On top of that, we didn’t allow ourselves to be mucked around Buckley’s indecision, and the announcement came leak-free. I feel like this has gone as well as it could have.

Change is good. This is a leap head-first in to the unknown, but I’m here for the ride and I’m right behind King. Can’t wait for season 2026 now, whatever that might look like.

35 minutes ago, monoccular said:

“Promoting” player numbers is so overrated. I will never forget when Liam Jurrah was “promoted” from 48 to 24 and he wasn’t even half the player he was before.

Sounds like he was exactly half the player he was before.

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

North supporters are livid with the selection if Bigfooty is an indication.

If he has a decent run at it health wise, then he might be good pick up for the Roos.

Why would they be livid? He’s FA so it’s a free kick. At his best he makes them better. If he doesn’t get back to his best, they miss out on pick 100 or whatever. There is literally no downside. Footy fans are so dumb sometimes.

Best of luck Spargs. Sad to see another premiership player go. Thanks for ‘21.

That was off its head. Massive goosebumps. Carn the Giants!

Gawn selected unopposed for my lifetime, at least that I can remember, so let’s say since 1990. I have no point of reference before that.

6 hours ago, BoBo said:

Let’s go Radelaide

I was heavily invested in Adelaide, but the Rankine thing left a sour taste in my mouth, so now I don’t care who wins it.

I’d rather it not be Geelong just because I’m deeply envious of their sustained success, but I think they’re worthy of a flag, and other than their nauseating capability of staying good for nearly two decades now, they’re largely inoffensive. Like most, I don’t like Collingwood much at all, but I think they’re cooked anyway so I’m not thinking about them really.

All I’m hoping for now is some tense matches and Hawthorn being knocked out in the EF. Carn the Giants then, I guess.

Let’s focus on the REAL issue here: how a Collingwood player dobbed on poor Izak Rankine.

Fair dinkum. If you don’t draw attention to the cultural problem, how are you supposed to fix it? More dobbers and penalties that increase over time please. If it’s five weeks this year, next year make it six.

Thanks for the memories Jayden. Loved the dual headbands when you and Ed were both flying - and who could forget that torp?

Stiff not to be a premiership Demon, but that’s life.

7 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Imagine having to now rely on Essendon to get you into finals.

How about Pat Voss being on Essendon’s list for two years, 0 games and delisted? Whoopsie.

Oh Oskar.

The silver lining is that the Dockers fans, who have mostly already conceded the game to the Dogs, get to have their misery prolonged by another three days while they await the Suns Bombers result.

Not sure when I started getting such joy out of other supporters pain, but here I am.

Is there a harder to look at footballer than Sam Collins? Good lord.

Anyway, carn the Suns. I want to watch the Dogs Dockers knowing it’s a true sudden death.

7 minutes ago, Smokey said:

Langdon is going to be a star.

I think he’ll probably just be a workhorse who runs his butt off with a pretty iffy kick that sometimes comes off and is sometimes awful.

Langford on the other hand…

Was tonight everyone’s first time watching Melbourne this year? I’m stunned by the shock and anger at this result. Disappointment I get, but surely our inability to win when we’re in a position to this year was known and expected?

I was worried we might fizzle out and get spanked, or half-arse it to a timid 30 point loss. I’m just relieved.

Plenty to work with for the new coach. Adios season 2025.

Just now, Demonstone said:

Just redid my sums and you're right, dammit.

We almost certainly cost them top 4 if we beat them though, and finishing as low as 7th is plausible. I’ll definitely settle for that.

2 minutes ago, Left Foot Snap said:

Sorry Nasher, but kicking or hitting the ball away in that fashion should always be a free kick. Otherwise it will be used to allow the defending team time to get players back and negate the advantage. Although that one was a throw in, the same premise should stand.

If it was a free kick then I’d agree - absolutely a 50 all day long. It was a throw-in so WGAF. Nobody was advantaged or disadvantaged, it literally had no impact whatsoever other than making everyone have to stay at the ground for an additional 5 seconds.

18 hours ago, dees189227 said:

I dislike Collingwood as much as anyone nut that should had been a free against thilthorpe when he kicked the ball away.

No way. If that had been a free kick that determined the outcome of the game, there would have rightly been an uproar. The purpose of free kicks should be confined to actions that impact either the course of play or the safety of a player. What Thilthorp did, did neither.

Kicking the ball away belongs in the same camp of staging for free kicks or starting a melee in my opinion. Undesirable behaviour that we want stamped out, but should only have an off-field consequence, ie a fine.

Last night’s game was an absolute cracker and made me want more. If it had been decided by a meat-head having a victimless brain fart, I can’t say I’d be talking the same way about it.

16 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

We just have to beat them by 300 points or something for that to happen.

So you’re saying there’s a chance?