Jump to content

Wrecker45

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wrecker45

  1. Wrecker45 replied to dazzledavey36's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Under Roos we payed unders for everyone. If we have learnt anything as a club we will not touch him. Jeff Garlett says hi, along with plenty of mates.
  2. Wrecker45 replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    DC I'll never be fair to Collingwood. Also the review has been going for 6 months they could have had an earlier finishing date and thirdly I was gloating because we're not copping them when there has been a massive shake up at their club.
  3. Wrecker45 replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I love that Collingwood aren't releasing the findings of their review until after the match.
  4. The funny thing is he keeps kicking long bomb goals in his highlights reel.
  5. Times of India, 17 August 2017: But that is the concensus science. Of course that is an oxymoron.
  6. I haven't bothered reading any posts but given we are up to 42 pages I assume he has already signed.
  7. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001: Times of India, 17 August 2017:
  8. Wrecker45 replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    1) you are not selling enough banana vodka smoothies 2) wait for the finals and offer a deal for Melbourne members
  9. The game against St Kilda was season defining. We got a last 1/4 from Lewis that set a win at all costs mentality and a team that followed him. i have seen wosre thread's than this locked or removed by mods on demonland. He is a winner and he is ours.
  10. Wrecker45 replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It's funny I always though gout was caused by grog but my old man has been off this [censored] for 10 years and still gets it. one thing I know for sure; take the recommended dose of the medication. My father in law nailed as many pills as he could to mitigate against the pain and ended up with a urinary tract infection. Not pleasant!
  11. My bad. I thought i typed Hamlet due to the context and knowing the quote well. What are the odds spellchecker confuses the author of some of our greatest written material and auto corrected Hamlet to MacBeth? Now if you don't mind I have a straw to go and clutch.
  12. It will be nice when he contributes to a premiership. Dawes, Lamumba, Heffernan and that short bloke we got from Geelong were all premiership players. None of them were any good.
  13. I shivered throug it too. it should be preetty ficken obvious it was freezing cold. I am not pre disposed too evidence based , less exreme, or less frequent cyclones or cyclone activity. Any extreme weather specifically different from pre- industry agree with.the pre industrial revolution just like July wan't the warmenst on record in Melbourne unless you multiply it by 4, subtract the median and divide it again. The satellite data needs no adjustment and is accurate. Let's watch this figures closely.
  14. How does your tin foil hat cope with global warming? I froze through the warmest July on record. You must have been smoking hot with that head gear.
  15. that is not the quote I was referring too. There is nothing good nor bad, just thinking makes it so.
  16. One of the few logical posts in this thread. Am I 100% certain. Of course not, but what I have read makes man made warming based on co2 emmisions very difficult to believe. My mind is not made up on any topic let alone this. I will always change my mind when the facts dictate change.
  17. Normally people say let's agree to disagree. Not in this case. I didn't properly read the article I linked to. i agree I was wrong to conclude from that Spencer Street Socialist article. I'll always admit when i''m wrong. There is no shame in that, it is a sign of intelligence. At what point will you post your own argument from the 600 plus page document you cited? act 2, scene 2 includes my favourite line of Macbeth. You won't see me linking to the whole play to somehow try and validate a point. What is your point of posting a 600 + page article.
  18. Did you read the 673 pages of the alarmist article you linked too?
  19. I'll pay you credit Hardtack because I would be ripping shreads through you if the shoe was on the other foot. I can't get a copy of the original piece written by the CSRIO. I've been caught out for not bothering to properly read the article I linked to.
  20. Wrecker45 replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I just wrote an analogy about fighting unfairly and bought up Chris Lewis biting Todd Viney. Googled it to get my memory juices flowing and he only got 3 weeks. You could get more for. Jumper punch these days.
  21. The reason I am so confident I can tear apart any chapter is because both history and the facts are on my side. Rather than dodge around the issue choose a pertinent point, your favourite chapter or even a paragraph that you think makes sense. Post it and I will agree with it if there is any merit in it.
  22. It's also hilarious I linked to The Age. I despise the Spencer Street Socialist. Unfortunately the CSRIO seem to have removed the prediction from their website. What Government funded scientific body should have to bother with transparency?
  23. August 2003 and the CSRIO was warning by 2020 we may no longer have snow. http://www.theage.com.au/news/general/icons-under-threat-the-alps/2005/11/18/1132016933810.html Does anyone think the snow will vanish in the next 3 years or did our peak scientific body have it wrong? of course the BOM and CSRIO rely heavily on their climate change funding. No problem, no funding.
  24. "If I only had a brain" scare crow, Wizard of Oz.
  25. 673 pages. Do you agree with it all like a sheep? Surely you have the smarts to be objective about some? which chapter do you agree with most strongly and why?