Jump to content

whatwhat say what

Life Member
  • Posts

    15,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by whatwhat say what

  1. i've been saying it for years. he's just not very good - an okay kick, but shocking decision maker with no lateral movement and zero awareness. clearly not a defender - give me ward, walsh and brown any day over bell.

    i'd still like to see him trialled as a tagger in the middle, but clearly the likes of junior, dunn and bartram are preferred in that role.

  2. and that's the thing. it's clear that, in reality, the dogs appear the only side interested in giving robbo a three-year deal.

    but as a 29 year old with a history of knee troubles what is he worth in a trade? given that they used, what was it, a third-rounder for aka then perhaps a 2nd rounder for robbo? not enough for mine. and not farren ray. he's just like tj - no muscle development and skills that look fantastic but misses targets surprisingly frequently for one so skilled, and exerts no defensive pressure (which may have to do with the muscle issue).

    i think you can safely rule green out of being traded based on comments made from officials at the club. he's considered a leader.

    but, as most of us have been saying for about 3 years now, one of tj, green, or bruce must go for the betterment of the overall side. it's just a matter of what we can get from them to best maximise not only our benefit but the trading club's as well. i think a player like bruce could really benefit a developing brisbane midfield.

    of course, we may not involve ourselves in trade week at all, with bailey chalking up our shocking performance in 2007 to poor preparation, poor gameplan, then a poor injury run. we shall see.

  3. they're called 'trade possibilities' for a reason, hangon.

    as i see it, the ones i mentioned would be the only ones on our list that perhaps could be valuable to other sides, and get us someting valuable in return.

    so the very reason that i suggested the players that i did is that i see them as being potentially valuable to another side, much as they have the possibility to be potentially valuable to us (if they get their 'heads' right, if they learn how to hit a target and not just blaze away, if they can kick more than 35m per foot, if they can learn to use their right side of their body, etc, etc).

    i'm certainly not advocating them all, by any means. but perhaps one, two, or three of them could be potentially beneficial for both our club and others too.

    you have to give something in order to get something.

  4. Clint Bartram

    Matthew Bate

    Simon Buckley

    Nathan Carroll

    Aaron Davey

    Lynden Dunn

    Ryan Ferguson

    James Frawley

    Colin Garland

    Simon Godfrey

    Brad Green

    Ben Holland

    Mark Jamar

    Paul A. Johnson

    Travis Johnstone

    Nathan Jones

    James McDonald

    Brock McLean

    Brent Moloney

    David Neitz

    Michael Newton

    Ricky Petterd

    Jared Rivers

    Russell Robertson

    Isaac Weetra

    Paul Wheatley

    Matthew Whelan

    Jeff White

    Adem Yze

    Trade Possibilities? Where to & for what?

    Daniel Bell - Adelaide for first round draft pick / second round and a Victorian kid or perhaps third round plus Meesen?

    Cameron Bruce - lower end of the first round in the draft / higher end second round (perhaps Hawthorn, Footscray, Brisbane) or perhaps Cameron Wood directly from the latter?

    Chris A. Johnson - West Australian team, hopefully 3rd or 4th round of draft

    Brad Miller - don't expect any offers, imagine he's under contract. Will stay on if so.

    Colin Sylvia - first round draft pick or similar not-quite-there player from another's list (such as one of Hawthorn's current ruckmen, Fisher from Carlton, etc)

    Rookies

    Jace Bode - elevate

    Daniel Hughes - hold

    Shane Neaves - elevate

    Daniel Hayes - drop

    Gone or should go

    Clint Bizzell

    Nathan D. Brown

    Byron Pickett

    Heath Neville - delist

    Daniel Ward - delist

  5. good contest so far.

    melbourne started fiddling with the ball too much which got the filth back into the game to a certain extent.

    losing travis - hamstring - is a huge blow, but collingwood lost harry o'brien early on too.

    c'mon dees. keep fighting.

    jones, junior, p johnson, biz, mclean, wheatley all v v good so far.

  6. i think we saw the real effects of 2 close losses.

    no one was prepared to chase. at all. the defensive pressure that we thought may be there after getting oh so close for 2 weeks in a row evaporated into the vapour waves of chris judd streaming forward.

    oh, for a superstar like that at the mfc.

  7. bell was horrific. again. his use of the ball makes ward and brown look like superstars; he tries hard, but he's very, very trying.

    miller just didn't give a whimper, did he? awful.

    i dunno. the losses aren't bothering me anymore. i'm just expecting that they're going to continue to mount up.

  8. pressure on miller is huge now. with robbo coming back, he really should be dropped anyway, and newtown MUST be close to debuting.

    great to see hughes sounding impressive, and i'd prefer wheatley to ward or brown. i'm positive he could play on their players at least as defensively as they can, and be better skilled when he has the ball into the bargain.

    he's always played as a medium tall player on tall players. it'd be great to see him play as a medium tall on slightly smaller players. i think he might have the agility to do fairly well.

  9. commentators say that very even performance.

    commentators opinions:

    sautner prevented, "but it was telling that he and robbo spoiled each other."

    impressed by robbo, had a hand in 6 or 7

    wheatley miserly in defence, link man across hb

    bizzell terrific in the middle or down back

    poyas cutting across hb

    like the look of gallagher

    summers in and out of the game

    hughes - only played for 2 quarters, livewire when he came on the ground

    holland down back an old head.

    no mention of newtown. sounded to me via their very bias call that he was very, very good

×
×
  • Create New...