daisycutter

is that all? just those two?

seems like the afl are happy to give anyone a manager licence (i presume they do need to be accredited/licenced)

learn something every day on demonland i never realised that it was christians who invented marriage and if the left think it is a "ridiculous construct" why are they fighting for gay marriage? christianity (apart from its beginning period) is probably at its lowest point ever in participation, relevance and secular influence, yet you feel oppressed by christianity. sheesh. I can't even think of one acquaintance who attends a christian church. sure, i know they exist but your christian paranoia over a token, marginalised and declining religion is very misplaced

thanks, red. so could any member of the public sue the afl (or its office bearers) even though they themselves are not directly affected?

can we limit ourselves to the century we actually live in (your history by the way is very selective and biased)

do your own research there are those that do. not necessarily the full, strictest version, but i suppose the concept of the thin edge of the sword is too difficult a concept for you to grasp turkey is not far from changing from a secular state to an islamic theocracy

hey dieter, why don't you tell us all about sharia law punishments? suppose that's a no-go zone for human rightists Current Membership of the Human Rights Council, 1 January - 31 December 2016 COUNTRY TERM EXPIRES ON Republic of Korea 2018 Russian Federation 2016 Saudi Arabia 2016 Slovenia 2018

lol, dieter.......how very predictable and droll try googling chalk and cheese

also interesting that NO-ONE has tried to take danks to court to force out the "truth"...........or maybe not too surprising

interesting the hun (major essendrugs apologist) today had no article on this, despite a large spread on fitzpatrick

can any legal eagle here explain to me under what "authority" is this person suing fitzpatrick and mclaughlin? i mean he doesn't represent the essendon club or the players and the afl is a private corporation. i seems to me that this is more an exercise to publicly embarrass the defendants by forcing them to disclose information under oath, rather than to win a court case. i'd also like to know if the defendants can even be forced to give evidence. could their lawyers not adopt the stance that the plaintiff must first prove their case and the defendants stay silent? or is that just an option in criminal cases?

diets, sweat, urine, excrement, dandruff, toenail clippings and infection are all natural. as are cockroaches, rats, lice, tapeworm, snake venom and broccolli. there are plenty of natural choices if you just look

well it's not for eating, diets. btw neither is ice natural. mortein will do the trick with blowies but unfortunately it too is not natural. co2 however is natural.

think biffo moved to marg a long time ago, diets

as in "neither a zealot or ideologue be"

dimwit's " Beyond Boundaries Group" sounds reminiscent of "whatever it takes"

silly boy

check your post. the quote is headed as "AF" instead of "Biffen"

how inconsiderate of him after you went to all that trouble

as you know, like politics, in the media the dross rises to the top

you should be more careful with your quoting diets, don't think af would like being misquoted as for "twitter and bisted" you do a nice facsimile yourself

sigmund would have a field day with you, mr leg

there are other reasons i don't find the comparison valid, based on my recollection of diesal's standout skills. but that's just a personal perspective and it's far too premature anyway

but titian ur anu doesn't work, mooney

you forgot innovative electrical wiring, biffo