Posts posted by daisycutter
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 hours ago, Sideshow Bob said: Still for the life of me can't work out how payouts following medical retirements while contracted remain in the salary cap in any capacity. Obviously the concern is being dodgy - doing big deals and being able to wipe them off the books with some trickery. But the space is different now with concussions literally wiping players out of the competition instantly
it should be emphasised that in these cases however it is different because it was the afl medical officer who forced the retirements
no scope for club trickery here
-
-
6 minutes ago, old dee said: Agree 100% deezone. However as far as this project is concerned it is concerning that the length of time this is taking just to get approval. With every passing day I get the feeling it is not going to happen. I know the wheels of democracy grind slowly but this is glacial.
oh, i don't know od. the wheels of democracy have stated the suburban loop is scheduled to complete by 2053 (assuming no delays 😉)
-
-
-
2 hours ago, Willmoy1947 said: Just to remind Daisy cutter and Old Dee they were discussing the insoluble venue position in Jan this year here, and worried about their resilience before something would take place ...well it looks like something is going to happen.
Cheers
??????
just to remind w1947 that i have always been very positive and supportive of caulfield
p.s. daisycutter is one word without capitals
-
-
-
-
14 hours ago, Redleg said: Ed Richards knocked out an opponent with a forearm and they called it a football act, so May has a chance.
Best thing is he didn’t turn his shoulder to Evans and he was running straight at the ball and then didn’t brace or lift his arm.
Red, do you know who may's advocate will be?
i hope it's not that perpetual loser we always seem to use
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 hours ago, Damo said: If Elstenwick Park Oval 1 is now free from VFA Duties, since according to reports, Waverley Park is to take over the Umpires training and associated duties, then it in my mind becomes available for discussion as a home base for us.
I did give up arguing against the usual Naysayers years ago but it now really needs consideration.
The oval is large and there is a second oval on St Kilda St that I admit has many games on it, but booking it for 9-4pm it seems largely free .
But the main oval is just not used much. It can be locked, is close to all forms of transport but has claims from Match of the Day VFA, some cricket and the Umpires. If Punt Rd is big enough then Elsternwick Park is bigger, wider and close.
who says "punt road is big enough". It patently isn't
when we leave the ferals and the filth will have a gigantic tussle over gosch's as a second oval
-
19 hours ago, Ghostwriter said: You think they don’t know how terrible they are in front of goal? Maybe they have “done enough” in terms of accuracy during training sessions but like I said, gameday is a whole different thing. How do you think they should train for that? Not rhetorical, it’s a genuine question.
no doubt there is a lot of psychological pressure involved during gameday
but one of the benefits of practice, practice, practice (structured with supervision, analysis and follow-up, of course) is you develop a higher degree of instinctiveness and muscle memory, minimising the psychological game day nerves.
it just staggers me we don't seem to apply an extensive scientific and professional approach to the most important skill ... i mean games are won or lost on goal kicking ... simple as that
Training Ground?
in Melbourne Demons
·
Edited by daisycutter
i think the main problem with the 2nd option (south east corner) was no close access to ovals. i.e. no tunnel and probably mrc not wanting a new tunnel to be built, and of course the extra cost of a tunnel.
and of course the reasons of transport difference luci explained