Redleg

JKH has not developed as we had hoped, but his form at Casey has been great. He deserves his chance, as did Billy and Frost last week. JKH is small and lacks pace, but he has been able to find plenty of ball and goals at Casey, in generally poor conditions and has clearly earned his recall and a chance to cement a place on the list and possibly even in the 22. Do I think he will be on the list in 2019, not if he fails in this game.

I can't believe with that star studded trio as well as Guthrie, Kelly and Duncan, that the Cats are the worst clearance side in the AFL. It just beggars belief.

Thanks.

We would probably need to overcome the 3-4 soft goals the Cats will be given as well.

4.35 pm on a saturday. A strange time for us to be playing.

Does Bernie know Gaff?

I actually think on the narrower ground we are a chance to beat them.

Let alone twice in the one game and one of those was about 15 meters directly in front.

Hunter was injured last week and MacRae seems to be coming back very quickly from a Hamstring.

This going to the team you followed is not a trend in the AFL, just ask Juddy, Buddy and Prestia.

Especially at home, as Tom Jones said.

Yes, the Sun prints the frees at the bottom of the player stats and states the location they were paid, D50, Mid, F50.

Clearly not. Actually the grass covers more ground than ANB and has better skills.

A few weeks ago Roos said he would become a star.

Better weekend this week lads!

It isn't and it wasn't.

You are.

1

Saw an article that said according to the author, he was staying or coming to the Dees.

If the AFL website article is correct, he is either staying or coming to us. Other clubs seem to be out of the picture.

Certainly by me it is underrated in his case. lex Neal-Bullen 9 5 14 3 0 1 1 4 1 2 68 Also seems to be underrated by the AFL points grading system as well, placing him as one of our worst players for the game.

Why do you say that? He only missed two set shots, straight in front, both about 15 meters out, that any 5 year old would kick.

Yes.

This is the Rule : if the player touches the post but not the ball it is play on. The goal umpire in this incident called it a goal and asked for a review, to see if the ball touched the post earlier, when CP touched the post. If the video we saw was used as the only video, then we have a wrong call, as it didn't show the ball touching the post and the umpire's call should have stood.. If there were different views and they showed the ball touching the post, correct call. However, as this was Darwin and there would be less cameras and maybe an inexperienced camera umpire, he may have guessed and it was an incorrect call. Nothing we saw on the TV showed the ball in contact with the post, so I think there is a strong chance we got dudded.

No he was asked and said I thought it was a goal, can you see if it touched the post.