Chook

Another goal to old creaky Sellar door.

Goal to Davey. Apparently "Melbourne got one that they ... probably shouldn't have." If it were a Port player, it would have most certainly been goal of the day #4.

First holding the ball payed to Davey in the last 6 years?

Another goal for Sellar.

Sellar hits the post. Unlucky. Playing a blinder so far.

Sellar into everything so far it sounds like.

One of the commentators is a moron who doesn't seem to know anyone who doesn't play for Port, but the main play-by-play guy is pretty good.

lol at those fools who think that Sellar can't mark.

For anyone not wanting to listen to the commentary because of bias, it doesn't seem too bad so far. Of course, their knowledge of our players is not as good as their knowledge of Port Adelaide, but what can you do?

You mean current Richmond player Ricky Petterd?

They also seem unable to grasp that Jack TrenGOVE only has one "r" in his name.

TuneIn also has a website you can go to if you're on a normal computer (I think you'll need the app if you want to listen using an iPad or the like).

I've always thought he looked like so much like a VFL player that you could spot it from the moon. Credit to him for sticking around at AFL level for so long though.

Anyone remember what happened to Liam Jurrah a couple of years ago when the brains trust of Dean Bailey and co decided to play him on some god-forsaken oval in SA? He ruined his shoulder and we all cried about it for months. Now that an actual coach is in charge, the other 50% of the nuffies who run this site are complaining about NOT playing our stars. Is there anyone here who actually thinks about the future? There is almost NO point in risking our best 22 in some random practice match, since they're already certain to be in our team anyway. There are about a million other reasons not to play our best players (ha!), but I won't bore you by writing a list. Suffice it to say that Renmark is going to bear witness to two decidedly B-grade teams on Sunday, as well it should.

lol at the renamed thread's title

What would be more embarrassing to us? That our rejects are actually good, or that they suck? Surely it's the latter.

It's one of those rules where even though in an ideal world no-one would do it, I still don't want to see anyone get a free kick against them for doing it; simply going for the ball should not be judiciated against.

Aren't there two subs now?

With Frawley's concussion, let's hope he doesn't accidentally fly to Denmark instead.

An enforcer? Are you kidding? What is this, the 80s?

After intense mathematical investigation, I have come up with the following Premiership winning formula: To win the flag, we need n + 1 champs, where n equals the number of champs we have.

Yeouch! Hang on to your lunch (or dinner)!

Interesting fact: Girls like the prepubescent look. In this case, it appears evolution got it wrong.

They're certainly no Mitch Clark, but they're not as incompetant as you're making out. Isn't "bringing it to ground" something that we've been crying out for for years?