rpfc

One does not simply misuse the Boromir meme. It is folly. Now that’s pedantry!

Well feel free to take the pressure off him with the ‘rpfc guarantee’ that he won’t play (but will stay on list) until at least 2030. That’s another rpfc gaurantee!

I will consume this content as the preamble to the movie of our next flag. Ta

The melts would have been delicious. I would gotten drunk on the tears of the self-righteous and ignorant… “Farrow was so much higher than Pickett in all the Phantoms!1!1!1” Ahhhhhhhhhhh.

Why has noone ever mentioned putting May up forward?! It’s a lack of imagination that I, in the form of this post, through the medium of this forum, have to be the FIRST to bring up this idea, or thought bubble if you will.

@WERRIDEE

I’m proud of them but they should be playing Carlton after a week off…

‘Nothing’ on the players? You are right it is more on the admin but some poster told me that the players go to games and that says they are ‘holding up their side of the ‘one club’ bargain’ Nonsense. That read above was infuriating- they are doing their captains run before an effing prelim. They are sticking around to make sure ‘the boys get their kms in’ - get around the girls and then go do a run around the tan… It’s nauseating.

Welcome aboard! See you in 2030

lol beat me to the joke … … You’re not joking are you

rpfc prognostication… Overthinking recruiters overlook big bodied gun. There i said it HOLD ME TO ACCOUNT PEOPLE Hold me to account

That’s a rookie draft talent? Okay…

Don’t you get me too excited now

Injury and being 170cms ‘tall’ I would say

We have 2 spots on either list. Now I am fairly certain we will commit to Kalani in the RL, but I hope we hold a spot open for SSP.

I hope we keep an SSP spot open till the eve of the season.

We have two list spots left: either both PL, RL or a 1-1 split.

This is what picks in 30s is for - injured players with leadership qualities that might have a higher ceiling and lower floor.

Your question has the answer. We picked up Jefferson based on (my opinion) us needing a tall forward and he being the ‘best of the lot’ at ND15 a few years ago. You don’t push it with ‘needs’ at the draft.

Also good to confirm that we didn’t have a top ten pick after all. Just want that stipulated for the record. 11 and 12. Yeah, I’m particular and stubborn. Have we met?

Yes, and in the case of Rivers - this Lindsay kid makes it even easier to keep Trent in the midfield. Sparrow also would want more time in there - I am not the biggest fan as he is one dimensional but you need that dimension, it just tends to be for Viney or Steele. Which brings us back to the point - we used Petracca’s value to replace Judd and to get Kade and Kozzie a friend in the forward line. A fine way to spend picks just outside the top 10.

Not just saying… You’re quite brilliant sometimes you know?

“We really should have taken a midfielder we didn’t rate!!” How many mids do we have to bloody take? Windsor, Lindsay, Langford, even some say Tholstrup is better as a mid. ??