Jump to content

DeleteUser

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DeleteUser

  1. Catchier than big tall socks and sandals. Or Monadue's Meander.
  2. Or else there needs to be some accountability for the baffling seletions and continued selection of Vince and Lewis
  3. Heads must roll if we miss
  4. This ^ Big danger game
  5. https://www.facebook.com/AFL.Umpiring.Reviews/
  6. Sure, that's even better. Except Facebook is evil, donchaknow. Definitely agree re: non partisan.
  7. STOPPPP IT TOO MUCH GOOD IDEA
  8. Whilst i see where you're coming from....
  9. I can register a domain today and setup. any ideas for names ? Let me work on it an will advise
  10. I feel sorry for Treloar, you know, it's his means of earning a living, but SUCK IT PIES (sorry Adam, really, that sucks)
  11. A petition. Also someone could easily spin up a webform to bombard the AFL with the same pro forma email from diff people. Easy. I'd be happy to do it.
  12. I'll take that bet sir! I take it your odds will be forthcoming. I will then provide my bank account into which you can place my winnings from this wager rightaway as there is so low a chance of this occurring I am almost comatose in my comfort it won't happen
  13. Now this is a very interesting point , I'd love a hodge as a captain
  14. WHOAH WHOAH WHOAH Let's not let accuracy via technology get in the way here
  15. Fan petition needed. 1 person is an island. Might seem a bit twee, but a petition with say 50k-100k sigs calling for an umpiring overhaul would be something for the media to get stuck into Dill with. I suspect there would be sections of the media who would be delighted (except for biting the hand that feeds) but I might be wrong. Starting a petition and spreading has never been easier. We could also call for the summary execution of the Port Dees umpires for added entertainment value or else some forensic accounting of their betting accounts. Not at all suggestion anything amiss there, but it's good to be sure.
  16. Agree with all of this. As an objective observer of the WCE/ESS game with equal parts completely rational hate for both, along with admiration for ESS's start, I could not believe the umpiring against ESS.
  17. The predictor auto tip looks like it uses a lot of historical data which is as sound a basis as any to predict on. A week 1 Elimination Final flogging at the hands of Collingwood does not make me happy. I would much prefer to play anybody else (and lose to them). Literally anyone. Actually I don't know if anyone has done this, but I ran the predictor about 10 times and variously had us 7th playing Pies or Cats W1 @6th 6th playing Cats or Pies @ 7th W1 (reversal of above) 5th playing GWS, Hawks or Roos @ 8th No scenarios put us 8th or out of 8, and no scenarios put us above 5th. Of the above games I reckon we could account for GWS, Hawks, Roos and maybe Cats (low confidence though). Confidence low v pies. == Some big games Pies V Tiges @ G R 19. Crikey. Tigers Cats @ G R20. Crikey.
  18. Obviously the accuracy of ladder predictor turns on the %s, how accurate are they likely to be?!
  19. Awesome WCE away Week 1 with them getting a 5 goal umpire assisted head start
  20. +1 Roos sent a clear message in the DL podcast
  21. Wouldn't it be a very good lesson and growing for the team and brand (?)
  22. No he cannot pretty sure posters here mentioned port height yet we went in short and it was admitted as much afterward maybe the match selection committee can have a gander here first
  23. Maybe we should suck up more
  24. Golf. A totally apt comparison. Hmmm that looks to be a hard 7. Nope easy 6. Maybe umpires are just dopey
  25. What was the 75m penalty ????