In all honesty its hard to see teams above us on that chart being overtaken by us (apart from essendon).
I do think it will happen though, im just not sure who we will overtake.
I dont see how it sets the players up?
End of they day they had banned substances in their body via black ops and off site injections... they were responsible.
maximum bans. but not only for the players.
the club must burn for this.
if 2 of them are guilty the whole club must be rubbed out for 2 seasons.
8 games and a bye? so be it.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-26/afl-ordered-to-hand-james-hird-transcripts-to-former-player/6975944?section=sport
Turns out essendon already handed over all docs.
Lawyer cant believe there isn't an employment contract for Dank
They always make the same noises.
"But hes such a good kid"
"Would never mean to do this"
"Isnt a cheat"
"Leader of our club"
"Punishment is far far too harsh"
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/34860136?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_sport&ns_source=facebook&ns_linkname=sport
Interesting times in the fight against drugs in sport.
I disagree. At the end of the day footy is 22v22.
If one set of 22 has an advantage because they took whatever - even if due to support staff - then they have cheated.
Not to mention health concerns etc with injecting unknown substances....
case is being heard "in camera" which means no one is allowed in without permission.
the AFL were apparently granted permission to observe
essendon were denied
amazing how we havent heard a thing really given that essendon werent allowed in (sarcasm)
just need judges willing to join the very close dot between tb4 being imported to the chemist and into Danks hands to into the players bodies as part of their 10,000+ injections.