Mach5

I still remember the thread from a few years ago when he was 18. Rumours he'd be the KPP steal of the draft... but he didn't even get picked.

Ugh - really??

He's not the only one, I think there's a few on this forum that use the same tactic.

Right... Ok then.

You think? Well I'm calm. Who needs to settle down? You're the one who seems to be getting "dizzy" from everything going around "so fast", but for what reason I'm not sure.

What are you talking about??! Nothing has happened, nothing has changed. Settle down FFS.

Sad but true imo

Port did bid on Viney at 7, not that different.

Has a very good defender playing on him, and he just doesn't have the strength to get near it. The few times he has he's been worried out of it.

Doesn't take away from the point you're making, but Junction Oval is being re-developed by Cockram and the centre square is currently a muddy hole.

George Stone.

I think he did a bit more than just hang around and wait...

I believe he'll stay, but if we are to get pick 3, the smart money is on us using it on Todd Marshall.

Really? The difference between them is that difficult for you to decipher? Ok, I'll spell it out for you: Prestia, O'Meara & Marchbank are all trying to force their way to their respective nominated destinations, and naming their desired club assists in that; Hibberd is already going to MFC, the deal has been done, he doesn't need to influence proceedings with public statements of intent.

This is ridiculous. I've said it many times, but Jon Ralph doesn't half talk sh!t.

How is this even an argument? Everyone I'm the industry knows where he is going. We haven't got the numbers of players names out there in the ether because we don't have much to offer come trade time & need to keep our cards close to our chest. Last year we brought in Bugg, Kennedy & Melksham. They obviously saw MFC as a desire able destination. How many Dangerfields are there out there each year? Who exactly have we missed out on that we should have been into? This is such a silly argument.

Of course there'll be room for Egan. Stinear is there in a development capacity, not as a line coach.

Surely Brisbane has just given up due to the fact he hasn't shown anything in 2 years (due to injury), they seem to have a plethora of young talls up in QLD, and the general reinvigoration of a list when a new coach is incoming. I wouldn't put a line through the kid's name just yet. Leadership hasn't been provided to establish the right habits at the Lions. It's a bad place for any kid to end up at the moment.

Honestly, you are the most negative poster I have come across on any forum. You may try to pass it off as just playfully trolling, but really it's a bit sad.

More understated too.

Yep, really depends on how much he thinks is unders. I get the feeling young Laverde has a pretty good relationship with himself.

His face?

Also having completed the Level 4 coaching course. Not sure he'll win enough points to get a senior gig anytime soon though. I reckon he's not a popular choice, and his best chance of getting in the hot seat is doing what Roosy did in an interim capacity.

Apparently Rawlings is on the short list for the Brisbane top job.

Good draft for pacy outside types I think, 4 or so of them in the top 20. Seeing as it's a need, we may trade our way in. Thing is, these types are very hit and miss.