DemonLad5

This might be a stupid question but what does OP mean

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscribe/news/1/index.html?sourceCode=HSWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&mode=premium&dest=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-draft-2015-fitness-concern-on-sam-weideman-remains/news-story/8bf0ac4385adb23659b60ed19e94f427&memtype=anonymous Are there any Herald Sun subscribers that can copy and paste this article?

Oliver looks good playing for Murray but I just think its bloody risky to pick a bloke in the top 3 who didnt get selected to play championships

Depending on who is there and who isn't, i'm warming to the idea of Aaron Francis at 7 if he available. We could use a type like him. If Weideman or Curnow are available at 7 then take them, if not then I like Francis and he would be best available

Last week there was no chance but his average test results have changed some opinions

There was a HS article today saying that many clubs have turned off Weideman due to his poor tests, but the dees are still interested. Could he slip to 7?

I reckon if he is there at 7 take him.

Great work. I like it. Maybe just because you have us picking Parish, i like it nonetheless. I don't mind Francis as a high marking half back with good footskills who is a strong, fast risk taker who can play anywhere. Most of the good teams have one. Unless there is a better available key forward at 7 I would like us to take him although it seems like we have barley spoken to Francis. If he slips past us, we have to get Curnow or Weideman instead

Other way round for mine Parish bandwagon

One is 27 with 10 pre seasons under his belt The other is 18 with none.

Gary Ablett Jnr 181cm

I stand corrected, but Parish was the only one that was never gonna get to our pick 6

Think about it like this.. When we made 2 attempts to trade for pick 3, the 2nd one successful, Obviously we had a particular player targeted that would be available at 3 but not at 5,6 or 7. We didn't do it just to improve our draft position. IMO, we made our decision weeks ago and the statement on mfc website by Taylor was a suspense tease. Brett Anderson only made the comments about hearing that we'll take Curnow this week. So I believe it is Parish and has always been

I am still fixed on Parish at 3

Fair point. I just think Parish reminds me of a young Gary Ablett Jnr

Source?

My best mate got a 12.8 when he was 10...

He has fully recovered from his injury. If it still is restricting him then it's gonna be like that his entire career

Anderson has some strange theories no idea where he gets them

You are judging players based on their name?

The headline reads.. Great week for the Dees, Parish and Curnow drafted, followed by the re-signing of Jesse Hogan

Parish all the way HT

I'm 99% sure it will be kept quiet

No way we pick him at 3 that would be a terrible pick

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/afl-2016-why-melbourne-fans-should-be-optimistic-about-making-finals-and-retaining-jesse-hogan/story-e6frf3e3-1227606785412 article on Hoges' signiture and finals not being far off