ManDee

Not digital, broken is broken.

Pet hate. Sth Africa won by 9 wickets. How are wickets relevant in 1 day cricket? Surely they won within 18 overs. You can lose more wickets and win. You could score 9 for 200 and win against a side 1 for 199 is that a win by 1 wicket even though you lost 8 more wickets? Any mention of wickets when defining a victory in one day matches is anathema. Edit: You can win by runs - if they fall short chasing. Or you can win with balls remaining if successful in run chase or you can win on the last ball. You cannot win by wickets.

And at the end of your fast are you planning on changing your name to bacon & eggs?

Not quite a rechabite.

The complete French delicacy.

Ma Richardson

Most of those photos are of the Essendon board and a goat, apparently Tania was taking notes. McKenzie and Evans have photos of Tania and.......

Just send an email to PJ. There is a typo in the thank you letter from the club. Las Angeles! My question is, does this make me anal?

I must be a bit dull today BB. Capt? Not the boat? Edit: Typo

You reckon that's bad, I named my son Earl. After Earl Spalding!

Speaking of Jacks have you seen the WAGS photos? MFC site.

Happy with the Jacks, well most of them but wouldn't mind a few lions instead of Christians.

Love the logic 57 1 There is no certainty that he will fall to us at pick 2 purely on the basis that pick 1 comes first 2 Who do the Saint have that they could trade for pick 1? 3 Do you believe everything you read? 4 If we have 2 or more picks in the top five I expect us to keep the first one. 5 If we use pick 2 we may not pick Petracca anyway.

Not good head below?

Testing my new signature.

I don't think this is an issue. If they lost out on the deal they may think they will win the next one. We did not force them to trade , they wanted to. I think both clubs are willing to trade with each other, that is good, they would appear to have plenty of players wanting to move back home. What sensible person would choose to live in Western Sydney. (Scully - I rest my case)

How about we add to the lexicon. That Scully is a barrett. Or Collingwood supporters are barretts. I need to go to the toilet to do a big barrett because i have a bad case of the barretts. If you don't agree then you are a big barrett you rat barrett barrett. No offence to the reader. If you take offence go barrett yourself.

2009 Draft MFC 1 Scully - loser gone 2 Trengove - injured - we hope he returns 11 Gysberts - gone 18 Tapscott - going? 34 Max Gawn - could be the best of the draft for us - go figure 50 Fitzpatrick - could be second best. Sometimes the late picks can pay off, specially the big blokes.

Batting for the other side now are we?

Funny, you see two men in tights, I see the girl in the middle.

Simply a statement of fact. We all know it to be true, and he reinforces it on a daily basis.

I am not a Barrett hater either. I am fairly ambivalent about him. I do think he is a terrible waste of oxygen though. If I want to listen to the opinion of idiots I could go to a Collingwood Carlton match.

Maybe for outside mids, Tyson gets most of his possessions inside.

Might have been wrong!