It has been a long time since i have looked foward to reading the sports section of the paper after a demons game this year. So when i sat down to read it with a coffee this morning, i was litlte disappointed to realise that an imbecile had watched and reported on the game yesterday.

He gives Cam Bruce best on ground. Bruce was great, but not better than Bell or Green. And he managed to give 2 Adelaide players votes, even though, outside of about 20 minutes of play they were comprehensibly beaten all day. Would' Melbourne players have got votes yesterday if the results were reversed? He also managed not to even give Daniel Bell a mention in his match report even though he gave him 3 votes.

Can you believe idiots like this Davis Reed actually get paid to do a job like theirs?

It has been a long time since i have looked foward to reading the sports section of the paper after a demons game this year. So when i sat down to read it with a coffee this morning, i was litlte disappointed to realise that an imbecile had watched and reported on the game yesterday.

He gives Cam Bruce best on ground. Bruce was great, but not better than Bell or Green. And he managed to give 2 Adelaide players votes, even though, outside of about 20 minutes of play they were comprehensibly beaten all day. Would' Melbourne players have got votes yesterday if the results were reversed? He also managed not to even give Daniel Bell a mention in his match report even though he gave him 3 votes.

Can you believe idiots like this Davis Reed actually get paid to do a job like theirs?

Jerry - why not go to The Oracle's Match Review on Demonland? It's a much more level headed and unbiased treatment of the game!

He gives Cam Bruce best on ground. Bruce was great, but not better than Bell or Green. And he managed to give 2 Adelaide players votes, even though, outside of about 20 minutes of play they were comprehensibly beaten all day. Would' Melbourne players have got votes yesterday if the results were reversed? He also managed not to even give Daniel Bell a mention in his match report even though he gave him 3 votes.

Well considering that Channel 7 didn't even know who Daniel Bell was apparently, you can't expect anything less unforunately :angry: !!!

thats terrible channel 7 dont know jack [censored] anyway...

It kind of tells you exactly how they are really going in their coverage and reporting of the code.......

Well considering that Channel 7 didn't even know who Daniel Bell was apparently, you can't expect anything less unforunately :angry: !!!

What's that in reference to?

I was at the game so didn't watch any TV coverage.

I read it on another thread here actually (can't find it now sorry)......

Apparently he was referred to as Moloney.

What's that in reference to?

It was referenced here (post #13) in this thread Rogue......

Daniel Bell

Thanks

It has been a long time since i have looked foward to reading the sports section of the paper after a demons game this year. So when i sat down to read it with a coffee this morning, i was litlte disappointed to realise that an imbecile had watched and reported on the game yesterday.

He gives Cam Bruce best on ground. Bruce was great, but not better than Bell or Green. And he managed to give 2 Adelaide players votes, even though, outside of about 20 minutes of play they were comprehensibly beaten all day. Would' Melbourne players have got votes yesterday if the results were reversed? He also managed not to even give Daniel Bell a mention in his match report even though he gave him 3 votes.

Can you believe idiots like this Davis Reed actually get paid to do a job like theirs?

He gave Ben Rutten the 5th vote. Rutten was probably in the the bottom third of their best players ladder and might possibly have played his worst game for the year. You'd have to give the honours to Neitz. Who is Davis Reed anyway?