The Interchange Cap

[Sir Why You Little 37,550]

I heard KB this morning droning on & on about how great the (his) idea is, and that coaches are ruining the game.

KB has NEVER mentioned one fact, that is...When the 4 man interchange rule was approved the GAME CHANGED FOREVER.

KB wants to see football similar to what he played, now they were great days when i was growing up. But that game style is not possible unless the 19th & 20th man is returned.

This 20 cap rotation is a disgrace whilst teams are priming up for the season ahead.

I agree with Malthouse, Neeld, Clarkson etc who have spoken out.

KB put a sock in it please. You are wrong and out of touch....

[Chook 15,088]

I think the game should move to something like 5-7 subs and no interchange. This would give enough room to take off injured or poorly-performing players, but eliminate the ridiculous burst running that has taken over our game. No sport that lasts 2 hours should be able to have the word "burst" in it. AFL needs to go back to an endurance game. That's where it thrives, IMO.

[Sir Why You Little 37,550]

I think the game should move to something like 5-7 subs and no interchange. This would give enough room to take off injured or poorly-performing players, but eliminate the ridiculous burst running that has taken over our game. No sport that lasts 2 hours should be able to have the word "burst" in it. AFL needs to go back to an endurance game. That's where it thrives, IMO.

when does the Human race ever regress?

Your idea has merit but it won't happen.

The game will get faster, it has since 1897.

A player will collapse and be in serious trouble if an interchange cap is enforced.

People of KB's vintage just do not understand, but then he is a strange little man.