PLEASE, PLEASE don't give any of the new young players numbers of significance.

Give them all high numbers and give them time to earn a number of significance.

If we give Viney 31, Hogan 5 etc etc then it shows we have learnt NOTHING and will continue to be crap.

This is possibly the worst post I've ever laid eyes on. I can't even believe I'm bothering to respond to it.

You actually, seriously, legitimately think that the number we give a player not only influences how they play, but reflects the extent to which our football club understands what it is doing?

PLEASE, PLEASE don't ever post again.

The Martin deal was terrible. Going forward, he would have been a better first ruck than Jamar, who is on his last legs. While Martin has shown little as a KPF, he has always done well when given first ruck responsibilities and he would have added some much need pace around the ball to complement our slow midfield.

He played one or two good games as a first ruck. More importantly, his future was not as first ruck. That's for Gawn.

The decision to take Byrnes and Rodan smacks of desperation from Neeld. While others talk of their leadership qualities, not enough is made of the opportunity cost from them taking up spots on the list that could otherwise be developed into long-term player.

Yep, because we've never tried this before, and we're not doing it right now either.

Instead of giving Melbourne an E he should have given himself an uppercut.

When I read this, I just sat there and imagined it over and over again. So good.

Dr. Smith on SEN is again spitting bile on the club like Denham...

Care factor << zero.

GO DEMONS