After Malthouse came out and said that they would be resting players in the last game and that the game didnt mean anything anyway, well, to me that sounds just like tanking. Again the AFL turn a blind eye to anything Eddiewood. Why havent the press taken this up. They were hot on us but its OK to tank for the finals. Am I being precious here or is anyone else pi..ed off. I know I have to just suck it up but geez there is one rule for some and another rule for others.

After Malthouse came out and said that they would be resting players in the last game and that the game didnt mean anything anyway, well, to me that sounds just like tanking. Again the AFL turn a blind eye to anything Eddiewood. Why havent the press taken this up. They were hot on us but its OK to tank for the finals. Am I being precious here or is anyone else pi..ed off. I know I have to just suck it up but geez there is one rule for some and another rule for others.

Aren't they turning a blind eye to us aswell. They have flat out denied tanking exists, when it clearly does. And anyway, I think there is a fair bit of difference to a team managing their list heading into finals and a team implementing obvious tactics designed to lose a match.

Only the media believe in Tanking, it makes good paper headlines..

It's a non issue....relax

I'm quite satisfied with the AFL's stance on tanking because if any club gets investigated then we will too.

Let sleeping dogs lie