Jump to content

Decision making and skills

Featured Replies

Posted

What is wrong with Melbournes skills and decision making. I know we have young team but even our more mature players csnt hit a target or dispose the ball to there team mates advantage causing unnecessary pressure on the player. How many times do they pass it off to the team mate where they have an opponent right on themand they get caught. i like the way they are playing the game but sometimes they just play on too quick and dont read the oppositions defence. I know its very frustrating but it shouldn't matter what ground they are playing at when it comes to these two problems in our game.

 

their problem is they handball or kick to someone who has a player right up their clacker

even their handballs were terrible. they just rushed.

i like the way they are playing the game but sometimes they just play on too quick and dont read the oppositions defence.

I share a similar concern. Like you I am all for the attacking play they are trying to develop (either in the middle or from defence) but I fear certain aspects of our game are being lost here. There is an obvious trade-off happening out there IMO. In another thread I made comment that I think our play on at all costs approach is over the top and it can get to a point where "coaching" can simply become "conditioning". We are playing on in situations where we quite simply shouldn't and the repercussions are quite big due to not only the opposition capitalising but also our expended energy in mopping up our self made messes - not to mention that our opposition can exploit it with a simple zone. Attack is the best form of defence (by convention at least) so our general game philosphy is a sound one but we have to be smarter in how we go about it IMO and that comes down to the coaching side of things as well as the players.

 

I share a similar concern. Like you I am all for the attacking play they are trying to develop (either in the middle or from defence) but I fear certain aspects of our game are being lost here. There is an obvious trade-off happening out there IMO. In another thread I made comment that I think our play on at all costs approach is over the top and it can get to a point where "coaching" can simply become "conditioning". We are playing on in situations where we quite simply shouldn't and the repercussions are quite big due to not only the opposition capitalising but also our expended energy in mopping up our self made messes - not to mention that our opposition can exploit it with a simple zone. Attack is the best form of defence (by convention at least) so our general game philosphy is a sound one but we have to be smarter in how we go about it IMO and that comes down to the coaching side of things as well as the players.

Agree to a point. As the young backs and mids develop, they will learn to execute skills better under pressure and also which option is the best option. Yes the turnovers kill us and eat at me but if we go back to that stagnant style fo the last two years we will have made no progress. When we execute these well we move the ball well forward and look good. However, when teams play a really well drilled zone (which Adelaide did today) then we can be in trouble. I think the long term plan is right, it is just going to create heartache for us all in the short term.

  • Author

Agree to a point. As the young backs and mids develop, they will learn to execute skills better under pressure and also which option is the best option. Yes the turnovers kill us and eat at me but if we go back to that stagnant style fo the last two years we will have made no progress. When we execute these well we move the ball well forward and look good. However, when teams play a really well drilled zone (which Adelaide did today) then we can be in trouble. I think the long term plan is right, it is just going to create heartache for us all in the short term.

I dont want to see them go back to the old game style. Our game plan now is very effective and exciting when they pull it off put how many times do they pull it off a game? I think our back line and midfield have been not too bad this year its our forward line IMO lets us down more. We do not get a whole lot clean easy marks in our forward 50. Where it comes back to basic disposal skills not kicking to our advantage. Im sorry im just so frustrated with how they have played some really great games this year and some real [censored] poor games.


How can your forward line let you down when you don't get the footy in there enough and when we do our delivery has been poor. The only concern with the forward line is we are either kick chasing on our half back line or pushing up as per coaches instructions which usually leaves no options when we clear from half back and a wall of defenders waiting to pick our kicks off. IMO we need 3 players at all times in our forward half, at least on of this inside the 50m arc around 15-25m out from goal another on the 50m arc and another not to far away a crumbing forward.

The young players skills will get better, but Bruce, Bartram, Warnock, Miller, Rivers and MacDonald should be able to execute at this level and unfortunately they can't.

  • Author

How can your forward line let you down when you don't get the footy in there enough and when we do our delivery has been poor. The only concern with the forward line is we are either kick chasing on our half back line or pushing up as per coaches instructions which usually leaves no options when we clear from half back and a wall of defenders waiting to pick our kicks off. IMO we need 3 players at all times in our forward half, at least on of this inside the 50m arc around 15-25m out from goal another on the 50m arc and another not to far away a crumbing forward.

The young players skills will get better, but Bruce, Bartram, Warnock, Miller, Rivers and MacDonald should be able to execute at this level and unfortunately they can't.

Who is a dominating forward for Melbourne? I do agree though about leaving at least 2 players in our 50 when everyone else floods back to defend. When do get out of the centre we do struggle to to be accurate with our disposal in the forward 50. Its all over the ground thats why I started the thread with our skills and decision making. Just reading as well we are 4th Team with the most average disposals

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 140 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 110 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies