All this talk of how good or bad Bailey is,question to be asked is

1: What players have improved or got better since he took over.

2:Has disipline, pride in jumper, and the want to win no matter what improved.

If any of these questions the answer is no you have your answer.

This is why Brock left he's not stupid he saw the writing on the wall.

All this talk of how good or bad Bailey is,question to be asked is

1: What players have improved or got better since he took over.

2:Has disipline, pride in jumper, and the want to win no matter what improved.

If any of these questions the answer is no you have your answer.

This is why Brock left he's not stupid he saw the writing on the wall.

1: NONE

2: NO

I reckon Bailey has played his purpose. His purpose is PURELY to remake our list, delist the junk, and draft as many youngsters as possible.

I don't think he can take us to the next level. The fact that we aren't more competitive in game and haven't shown any clear signs of improvements is proof enough of this.

I think we should look to Malthouse as our next coach. He always seems to get the best out of his players and is a clever tactician. He has taken him WCE teams to premierships and Collingwood to several grandfinals and prelims. He's clearly a good caoch. He should target him for when Buckly takes over.

I reckon Bailey has played his purpose. His purpose is PURELY to remake our list, delist the junk, and draft as many youngsters as possible.

I don't think he can take us to the next level. The fact that we aren't more competitive in game and haven't shown any clear signs of improvements is proof enough of this.

I think we should look to Malthouse as our next coach. He always seems to get the best out of his players and is a clever tactician. He has taken him WCE teams to premierships and Collingwood to several grandfinals and prelims. He's clearly a good caoch. He should target him for when Buckly takes over.

The whole football department needs to be analysed - and most likely changed