Jump to content

Casey Up-date

Featured Replies

MFC are possibly waiting for answers as to how much MCC and AFL are assisting us, to know what our short-term available funding is, and then decide what they can contribute to Casey in dollar terms.

 
MFC are possibly waiting for answers as to how much MCC and AFL are assisting us, to know what our short-term available funding is, and then decide what they can contribute to Casey in dollar terms.

Melbourne don't have to contribute anything (as far as I know).

They were offered $500,000 in land but declined and wanted the cash instead. That cash is then being used to fund a pavilion upgrade, so essentially no money is changing hands between Casey and the MFC.

Initially the deal proposed was:

* MFC contributes $500,000 cash to the project

* MFC receives a $500,000 block of land

* MFC receives access to a $1.6 million facility.

MFC then sought a larger facility to be built at an extra cost of $500,000, and asked the Council to swap its gift of $500,000 land to an extra $500,000 cash contribution (up from $750,000 to $1.25 million).

This meant that the Council had to find more cash, but was prepared to do so.

The deal now proposed is:

* MFC contributes $500,000 cash to the project

* Council contributes an extra $500,000 to the project

* MFC receives access to a $2.1 million facility.

 
The deal now proposed is:

* MFC contributes $500,000 cash to the project

* Council contributes an extra $500,000 to the project

* MFC receives access to a $2.1 million facility.

I see.

Initially the deal proposed was:

* MFC contributes $500,000 cash to the project

* MFC receives a $500,000 block of land

* MFC receives access to a $1.6 million facility.

MFC then sought a larger facility to be built at an extra cost of $500,000, and asked the Council to swap its gift of $500,000 land to an extra $500,000 cash contribution (up from $750,000 to $1.25 million).

This meant that the Council had to find more cash, but was prepared to do so.

The deal now proposed is:

* MFC contributes $500,000 cash to the project

* Council contributes an extra $500,000 to the project

* MFC receives access to a $2.1 million facility.

You've done it again casey scorp.

If only the AFL could explain these type of situations as clearly & concisely as you.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 12

    Round 12 kicks off with the Brisbane hosting Essendon at the Gabba as the Lions aim to solidify their top-two position against an injury-hit Bombers side seeking to maintain momentum after a win over Richmond. On Friday night it's a blockbuster at the G as the Magpies look to extend their top of the table winning streak while the Hawks strive to bounce back from a couple of recent defeats and stay in contention for the Top 4. On Saturday the Suns, buoyed by 3 wins on the trot, face the Dockers in a clash crucial for both teams' aspirations this season. The Suns want to solidify their Top 4 standing whilst the Dockers will be desperate to break into the 8.

    • 118 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    The media has performed a complete reversal in its coverage of the Melbourne Football Club over the past month and a half. Having endured intense criticism from all quarters in the press, which continually identified new avenues for scrutiny of every aspect, both on and off the field, and prematurely speculated about the departures of coaches, players, officials, and various employees from a club that lost its first five matches and appeared out of finals contention, the narrative has suddenly shifted to one of unbridled optimism.  The Demons have won five of their last six matches, positioning themselves just one game (and a considerable amount of percentage) outside the top eight at the halfway mark of the season. They still trail the primary contenders and remain far from assured of a finals berth.

    • 12 replies
  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver. 

    • 9 replies
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

      • Like
    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

      • Like
    • 428 replies
  • VOTES: Sydney

    Max Gawn still has an almost unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award. Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Harvey Langford, Kade Chandler & Ed Langdon round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 46 replies