Dank's defence would have been informed consent on the part of either or the club and the players.
No way would they sue him as he would have said who knew what and when.
The importation and use of the various drugs was in no way illegal as I understand it.
The taking of the drugs violated the contractual provisions of the WADA code.
The only way that it would come out to the benefit of the club is if he was contracted to provided drug A (allowed) and he administered drug B (banned). The absence of records makes a mockery of this argument.
On the issue of blame the players have done their time and should be allowed back. No need for them to be treated as heroes.
What is badly missing is contrition and acceptance of responsibility by EFC, the Coach, the relevant staff and yes.... the players. Each had fault and each bears responsibility albeit in differing ways and to differing degrees.
Looking forward to reading the judgment when available.