chipa

that is a ridiculous comment to make...it's his job to speculate and to suggest possible outcomes. obviously he's not going to say things will "definitely" or "certainly" happen because that would just be foolish, hence i wrote "if" and "could". dont be so critical mate.

couldn't agree more! can you imagine the filthy reactions of collingwood supporters if it was clear malthouse was leaving at years end. he has no other alternative than to say he will not be coaching in 2012. stay positive dees supporters, there is still a possibility of malthouse being at the helm next year regardless of what any collingwood authority says.

Julian De Stoop on Fox Sports news just suggested that Eade could possibly end up being director of coaching at Collingwood should Malthouse want to coach next year. He said that Eade was planning on going into that role in 2004 before he took charge at the dogs. If this happened, Malthouse would almost certainly end up at the dees! He also suggested that if Malthouse was to stay at Collingwood for next year that Viney may see us through the 2012 season and then hopefully get Malthouse the following year. Would like to hear your thoughts...

We all believe we have a great list, with boundless potential, but it's starting to appear that it's a severely unbalanced list. Proof of this is that half our team today simply cannot kick the sherrin!

How can an AFL team have so many players who are dismal by foot? Bartram, Morton, Scully, McKenzie, Rivers, Frawley, Garland and Macdonald are all among those who have sub par kicking skills. How can we expect to be a competitive side with a team full of handballers? It's an absolute joke and I'm sick of it!

I would personally like to see Tapscott return and play up forward. He was drafted as a forward and was likened to a Chapman type player. Now with Nicholson and Strauss looking likely types down back (with great disposal) I would love to see what Tapscott can do up forward. Thoughts?