demon3165

Was fritta there and was anyone holding an umbrella for him so he doesn't get his hair wet?

Well you could have chained them to the fence sometimes you have to think outside the square for a cause...

Dunstall would not get a kick in our forward line let alone young players without teaching them the craft.

Lever is worse I'm afraid.

There is two schools of thought for selection this week and we know Goodwin never really makes major changes, with that he will either stick with last week's team except for injuries and see how they respond to last week's loss or really make an example of some players and drop them I guess we will soon see.

They have said they are in discussions, this is not an easy project especially dealing with Glen Eira Council and all the different sporting groups trying to be there as well.

It's just not the players fault it's the dysfunctional structure and ball skills by players further up the ground.

That's the problem I think some have been smoking it....

Ahh grasshopper join the dark side with McVee.

If the board reacting now shows a lack of faith in the football department and that causes more problems than answers, yes we have had two bad games, now the ball is in Godwin's court let's see how the players and coaches react before more petrol is poured on the flames.

Daicos would get 75 so I suppose that's a win.

If Sparrow is on daicos he will be out of breath in the first fifteen minutes and dacios will be the first play to get 100 touches.

Good to see another person's view on Oliver, he is not good by foot.

Well that's because in done in Confidence as they are in discussions with Glen Eira Council and state government that's not hard to understand.

How would you know what the board have been doing regarding caulfield project or any where else?

They have won a premiership with them, but tell me which president has gotten us one in the last 30 years?

Not wrong was expecting some sort of comeback but alas zip though we get the pies at the right time with their injuries.

It wasn't just the handballs it was the way they handballed at players feet, missed targets, taking the wrong option and some players who cannot use their opposite sides of their body, kicks that cannot make 20 metres or kick over a player when they are 10 metres clear, most of day it was a lack of skills.

Yes seen and answered I have seen more aggression in clips in the the new lad than 2 of them put together.

That's your opinion not mine so leave it there.

I suggest you take the emotion out of it, Maynard was up in the air as Brayshaw was kicking you are allowed to spoil a kick, where he went wrong was to turn his body as all players are tought to do and is no longer acceptable he should have got weeks for that part. If he had kept going with his arms up Gus would still be playing but Maynard did not deliberately go out and do that watch it again.

I don't care is that worrying you so bad get a life.

Rubbish it was a football incident the only problem I had with it was instead of following through with his arms there would have not been a bigger impact he turned his body as they are taught to do which is no longer acceptable, no coach would instruct a player to do that nowadays.

Oh so the President is in charge of the football department now and should be telling them how to play now your dislike for her influencing you thoughts. That's Buckley's view does he know what's inside the club I doubt it doesn't make him right.

Caldwell, why don't we go back to when we were first a club that's a silly point, let's go back to the merger times and past that. The club is in better shape than it has been for many years. As for the President they don't make all decisions the board does the board runs the club the President is the figure head so to speak.