binman
Life Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by binman
-
Won't help their running game much if lupinski is under done. On outs, we have really missed petty. -
Leaving aside the comments about the dees, you'd reckon they'd talk a bit more about the impact of their outs. Demonland would be if we were missing players of the quality of de Goey and Sidebottom, not to mention players like Mcstay, Elliot, mcreery and hoskin-elliot under an injury cloud.
-
-
-
Recovery time for that injury Webs?
-
Yeah, you mght well be right.
-
-
-
-
It was really similar, in the sense that it was near the boundary and Libba just stopped in his tracks - good get. I don't recall his ability to feint, evade and have so much time being highlighted as his assets when drafted, and i dont recall seeing him display those skills that often in the VFL games. I wonder if he is the sort of player that is better the higher level he goes to because the pace of the game is so much faster and suit his natural skills, for example because there's more super high pressure situations where elite evasive skills and instinctive quick thinking is required more often.
-
-
He was not a million miles off being back to his best against the blues. Watching the game live i thought how important he is to our side and how that importance is easy to overlook, in part because he is not partic flashy and as you suggest a lot of his great work is off the ball. The other thing i forget sometimes is how tough he is. Doesn't lose too many one on ones and has good dose of aggro.
-
-
The clip doesn't show my favorite bit of play from the Judster against the blues. He had the ball right on the boundary line, feinted and everyone around him seemed to just stop, perhaps thinking the ball had gone over the boundary line - which i exactly what i thought had happened watching live. It was weird - normally players with the sort of natural time the judster has is the one who appears to be standing still, but in this instance, it was everyone else who stopped! (I think the bit of play i'm talking about is actually the very first clip of the Judster in that video - and if so, is cut off right before the good bit)
-
-
You don't want to be playing your best footy in June. Grand finals are not won in winter. They are really looking for the bye. You can't expect a young player like Daicos to be up all season. Yes, they lost and their defense was porous, but don't you love how they don't go into their shell and stick to their game plan. I know they lost, but geez don't you love watching them play. I know they lost, but i can't see the dees beating them with Sidebottom and De goey back in the team. Yada Yada Yada
-
Yep, the weekly contender or pretender litmus test. I'm not sure if you read this, but i posted the following earlier in this thread: Scott basically said the media narrative, and refusal to see the macro picture is a load of hogwash in his post-match presser this week ....... I can't find the clip, but on the Sunday ABC radio footy show, the Lead, they played those comments from Scott and came back and said Scott had 'pierced the fourth wall' and called out the games the footy media play. The comments they played from Scott are 9:28 to 11:41 of this clip: Full post-match, R12: Cats (afl.com.au)
-
I saw that. And i agree with them. It is really hard to take David King seriously because he seems not to remember anything he has said in previous weeks and constantly contradics himself. (That, and the fact that in his 'rolling ladder' he has Freo (a team he relentlessly bagged last year) in 4th and us outside the top 4. Go figure - given the ladder says we are actually in at the halfway point of the year and Freo are not.) It's a shame because some f the stuff he talks about is terrific, particularly when he is using footage to make a particular point such as the example you note.
-
Yep, all reasonable points. And i think your conclusion that fatigue is a factor but not to the same extent as my hypothesis suggests is completely reasonable too. Which touches on one of the central planks of my argument - the media would have you believe it is not an issue and so rarely, if ever factor into their analysis of specific matches, meaning many fans don't either. If you accept that fatigue plays a role in performance, the logical next question is how big a role. You and i have come down in different places on that answer, which is great - at least it is being factored into both our analysis of say our performance against the blues. I just love that we are talking about this nuance, not ignoring it. But if someone trying to get their head around our performance against the blues doesn't factor it in (it's an excuse!) it's not possible for them to properly assess the performance (because they are ignoring a key factor) and so are more likely to default to the dees simply are not that good, we will be hammered by a decent side, good teams would have won that game by 6 goals given how poor the blues were etc etc Exhibit A of the above scenario is the half time 'analysis' of the blues game on Fox. I went to the game, was thrilled we won, loved our defensive work, was happy with individual performances and loved our improved work when the ball hit the deck in D50. I also watched the game expecting a low skilled, scrappy game with lots of skill execution errors - because of the impact of accumulative fatigue (and maybe loading). And so, i was not at all surprised that is exactly what i saw - the performance and game met my expectations. And i walked away from the G a happy man knowing we are 8-4 at the halfway point in the season with a terrific percentage and not too many injury concerns. I watched the replay last night. Normally i would skip the half time discussion but happened to listen to it this time. I thought i was living in alternate reality such was the vitriol directed towards the dees. Lyon, Brown, Buckley and Lewis did not mention fatigue once, or factor it in at all (which was weird because even BT pointed out in the call that the players looked like 'they had led in their shoes' and Buckley was a senior AFL coach two years ago). And as result their analysis was just plain wrong. Woeful to be honest. But a dees fan who isn't as obsessive and inside baseball as me might have listened to that half time discussion and come away thinking we are doomed and have no chance of beating the almighty Pies next week, let alone winning a flag.
-
-
-
I'll try again. If you paid an umpire say 120k a year, with bonuses, there would be heaps of young talented people who would see that as legitimate and attractive career pathway and career - particularly given you could umpire into your 40s. I would have as a young fella who would have loved nothing more than to be involved full time in footy but had no chance of doing so by playing. My son would too. I have worked in the community service sector all my adult life and there ain't many jobs paying 120k. So, I disagree you would have to pay them as much as players are paid.
-
-
-
