Posts posted by beelzebub
-
-
9 minutes ago, old dee said: That was my thoughts, I don't know a lot about the saints but if he was any good why sell the farm for the long haired blone. I actually thought he was nothing special at Carlton in the games I saw.
Because to buy a casino they had to sell their farm.
Make no mistake they're rolling the dice.
-
-
-
3 hours ago, Redleg said: It will probably come down to something like, if BH wants to come to us and say Suns relent and want our 2 first rounders and if those picks could get us say another Langford and say another Disco, what do we want more?
Also another poster mentioned Paddy Cross. Of course he is untested, but say BH is a 20 possession 2 goal a game player and Cross becomes let’s say a 14 possession 1 goal a game player, does that affect the above choice?
Then factor in the improvement of say Culley, Howes, AMW, Langford, Kolt and Windsor and say Trelly and Matthews start showing something, how does that effect the choice.
In other words it is a big investment in a player that has to be carefully considered and of course I didn’t even touch on the issue of a long and large contract that will be needed to get BH and the effect it has on our salary cap and player morale.
Another factor perhaps..
The ol' bird in hand worth 2 in bush but replace as One capable player now v 2 maybe in future.
If we start to get on a roll we need to pump up the tyres and wind out the throttle ...NOW.. not years into the future.
Ol Humpty would be of far greater value imho than stacking up the cupboard.
Just my 5c
-
-
3 hours ago, Dees051321 said: Gerald Whateley just said on SEN tha Melbourne membership day is next week and he will ask the questions about our home base to whoever is on. I’m guessing either president or ceo as other teams have had one or the other on for their membership days 😊 note sure what day he just said next week
Let's hope he does.
Do I expect a straight answer ?? Even one with a look at the hometurn? Are we even out of the gates ??
Nah !!
-
Edited by beelzebub
8 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said: Agreed. However, even in this age the final decision is usually only made once a specialist or specialists have had the opportunity of examining the patient.
Just pure speculation
Scan.. initial assessment..
Possible referral to another specialist for corroborating (or otherwise) diagnosis.
Might need a secondary scan/assessment if not straight forward
-
-
1 hour ago, daisycutter said: thanks for the link. some really good facilities there.
but it's not "everything under one roof". Remember we have to cater for more than just the seniors. As well as AFL there is AFLW, then VFL and VFLW both including listed players, and only "just" room for 1 oval.
solves some problems, but nowhere near "everything". better than now? maybe.
one problem concerns me is that if we give up aami, before we have a "guaranteed" caulfield go ahead, we could be left in a weaker bargaining position. lots of people want to get their hands on aami (filth, ferals and tennis)
Casey !! VFL /AFLW
Nuff said
-
On 22/02/2026 at 10:01, 640MD said: Can still only see about 8 possible wins. But if we can score like Friday. Well over 100 points and if Latrelle and kossy can excite , going to watch will bring in the punters who can smile at the future.
If you don’t pursue the wins you will not get them. Go Dee’s
Open 'both' eyes 😉
-
-
-
-
10 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said: Our key talls are going down like 9 pins, unfortunate for Kentfield.
Windsor and Langford were fantastic. The tap work from Gawn was sublime.
Team V Saints
B: Lever, Petty, McDonald
HB: Jiath, Turner, Salem
C: Langford, Steele, Lindsay
HF: Chandler, van Rooyen, K.Pickett
F: Fritsch, Miocek, L.Pickett
FOLL: Gawn, Rivers, Windsor
IC: Langdon, Sparrow, Howes, Tholstrup, Heath
EMERG: Laurie, Culley, Sharp
Don't mind that...
But tbh id swap Pretty for May in a blink
-
-
Well.... the weather... right.... 🤔🙄
Apart from Batmans unfortunate day there was a lit of good about today. Strangely ( or perhaps nor for long time readers lol ) many of the real positives for me revolve around the things that DIDN'T go quite so smoothly. It's good imo to find out these things at a real dance ( not with sisters ).. as we can see that these are things to work on.
Some things, well quite a lot are starting to click some...mehhh. I thought against the Roos our defence was iffy... again today... there was iffyness.
Over to you Kingy
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, hardtack said: I saw it that the Tigers player was in a contest with the other Melbourne player, had eyes for the ball, and unfortunately Luker got taken out. Clumsy yes, and he may do time, but I don’t believe there was anny intent involved.
Tbh... I've now watched that half a dozen times the Tiger was NEVER really in the contest... he was in the vicinity and just had his arm up to collect whatever he could. .
Thats what I saw... happy to disagree Hard ;)
-
-
4 minutes ago, demoncat said: Really sloppy by the Tigers defender and totally avoidable if he took more care with his spoiling action
And I know nuffies will say “it’s only an accident, it’s part of the game blah blah blah” but we’re clearly at a point where players should be held accountable for their actions (even if they are football actions)
If you can’t make a play without endangering another player, don’t do it
Very ..'sloppy'.. some players... you know... just take opportunities. They're around.
-
-
On 25/02/2026 at 14:51, Redleg said: When was the last time you saw 30 racehorses in a race at Caulfield and all running together, stretched across the track, at any point in a race? That is the only way your scenario could exist.
Why would heavy club machinery, other than lawnmowers need to go over the tunnel area?
Where did you get the figure of $20m for a tunnel under the track from?
He's talking 💩
15 thousand tons 🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Plainly nfi


PREGAME: Rd 01 vs St. Kilda
in Melbourne Demons
Oh my wordy wordy yes they will.
I think our list is better. In so much as it makes for a better team...
They look OK possibly on paper...
We've looked better on the track... imho