beelzebub

Im still overthinking ( obviously ) these bloody things .. I do see a couple of subtle clues ... ( this done after a few Proseccos , standing on a chair , on my head squinting )

I mean.... this is clear as ........MUD !!!!

These always remind me of Ol' Jeff's cartoons.... just gotta find the bloody hook !!

10 minutes ago, The end is nigh said:

Think Howes was one of those ‘it’s not working well enough here, let’s try him down back’

Personally, not overly confident he can break the ceilings set by his teammates for a spot anywhere in the starting team.

New voices coaching him, his attributes might be better utilised. Hope you have a great summer Blake!

I suspect Howes will one of quite a few who will be totally re-evaluated. Whilst some fd folk are still around from previous regime the new lot have new ideas and different requirements. They're no bunnies. Some roles will remain essentially the same... a new slant on the game plan/style will throw up a different criteria. It could well be some players who could quite fit the old way well might blossom in the new. Conversely some will become Casey stalwarts ....

Howes , imho, is going to be among a handful.of players on the endangered list.

Not that he can't play... but newer models are already on the showroom floor.

The competition for spots will become heightened.

Forget everything you've seen over the past seasons ( immediate) about team selection, placement, strategy, style.

This is a bran nu day !!!

All bets are off

Go Dees

The time for May up forward has well passed.

King will be building a team to compete for flags 27 onwards.

I doubt May will be there.

Time to look where we're going... nit where we are

Just now, beelzebub said:

We won't be trying to fix everything in one off season. Just getting the ball rolling imo.

26 will be a transition year.... from what we were ( fill in blank ) to where we're going in 27 and beyond... finals and flags.

It might not seem so unbalanced once we see the nature of the beast ( unfold ).

Actually looking forward to the first bounce.

Oh yeh.... the quiz.. lol

Never mind me

We won't be trying to fix everything in one off season. Just getting the ball rolling imo.

26 will be a transition year.... from what we were ( fill in blank ) to where we're going in 27 and beyond... finals and flags.

It might not seem so unbalanced once we see the nature of the beast ( unfold ).

Actually looking forward to the first bounce.

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Sounds like Casey will be used for games primarily then, not training.

Might get use for lock out training.

33 minutes ago, Demon Head said:

Open training? Can anyone find Myrtleford on the map of Victoria?

Can't believe that any avid Skier wouldn't know where Myrtleford is ...

28 minutes ago, Redleg said:

We would be building east of that oval and I have no idea on the second question, but looking at that area currently I would guess no, as it doesn’t look big enough to support a VFL crowd, but who knows.

I don’t know what the future proposal for Casey is either.

Maybe others know something about this aspect of our future plans.

I believe the club has no interest in a "ground" just a training/admin hub.

I'm thinking given where that will be and to give easy and proximal access to the 'internal' ovals ( new ) there will quite likely be need for another tunnel. This and of itself is neither hard nor need impact the course for long ( or furlong 🙄 )

Look forward to the design reveal.

8 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Don’t tell me the Premiership cups are going in Fantasy land.

Next ones in Tomorrowland 😉

Will be interesting to see actual.plans emerge as opposed those lovely "impressions"

Pretty pictures are an attempt to convey 'warmth and fuzziness' ... the Engineer in me prefers drawings/plans

Back in my day.... as I grew up playing footy there were three distinct "followers" .. Ruck.. Rover....and Ruck/Rover... a hybrid of sorts. One of tge best and most readily recognised proponent of the latter... our own wonderful Ronald Dale. In fact he kinda became ( imo ) the prototype of the modern midfielder. Then the game shifted a tad and we simply had Rucks and mids. These then divided between inside mids and outside runners/dispersers.

Ive got a sneaking suspicion the way forward is going back to a more "utilitarian" followers. Not so much either in or out... just receive/get ball... give-off/use ball.. Exactly as ol'Barass would play.... I.e whatever the occasion demanded.... he did ( and did bloody well )

Fast forward 50 odd years.... we build the modern prototype utility. Bigger, stronger, faster... but still more a jack of all mids rather than this or that.

The Ruck nomination rule has changed... I think this will have some subtle and some not so subtle knock on.

Players like Culley and Onley will be worth their weight in gold.

I have absolutely nothing to base this on other than suspicion.

King is going to radically change our game.

Ironically so did Goody with the running press off half back....and then stymied by 6-6-6 . I think King is going to run ( literally ) with a set of utilitarian roving marauders...

Athletic types ...good footy i.q.. 194/195 types.... who are neither inside or out... but both and neither.

I am VERY interested in this development.

You dont pick a giant mid for no reason.

Just my thoughts ....

8 minutes ago, Harvey Wallbanger said:

That's a huge project if there is not government funding. Both State and Federal governments have partially funded all other AFL ground developments in Victoria. That's why we have to wait....

The government may or may not contribute.

It's NOT their build, not their property, not their asset.

In reality the MFC and what it does is nothing of the State Govs concern.

This ISNT a big build. It's not.

Shopping centres cost more.. I rail crossing removal... costs more...

Im personally very doubtful there's any timing controlled by the government.

Im given to understand the bulk of the money needed is already vouched for...and not government.

We've never been a fav destination for Gov money.... no votes 😉

6 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I was hoping "learnings" would have left the MFC vernacular when Goodwin left.

As an 'excuse' for failing... I think it has.

As a tool for progression... about to be employed.

Imho Onley will be among a group coming in that all have a footy i.q. But they're raw and at the start of their AFL careers. I find it no mere coincidence that we've a chap on board with extensive Gippsland knowledge and experience and we've a crop over recent times of some good Power talent.

I think we're building a better capacity and capability to develop such ilk.

Riley will benefit from entering into a system with elite mentoring. King is going to have an inherent knowledge of how to utilise tall mobile utilities. It's now up to the club to take these raw talented recruits and develop them into weapons. This refinement will take a little time. There will be good days and not so good days . Invariably it takes a varying time frame for players to settle, lose the awe of being there and get to tge work at hand.

A lot of "learnings" are going to be crammed into the coming months.

We ( well more than a handful here ) have lamented the dearth of 'intelligent" footy in Melbourne games over recent years.

I think Ron will come on well with suitable guidance.

DEES going to look very different in 26.

So will Casey... and some of these lads will play there initially. Riley like everyone else in Red and Blue has an opportunity to put his hand up..... granted when he does...its higher than most 😉 🤣

Good luck to all

9 minutes ago, Redleg said:

It is the only stand alone option of the three that have been mooted.

The first to me always seemed impractical.

The buildings can be totally fenced off from the rest of the area, excluding the ovals of course, with it's own separate access to the adjoining streets being Neerim Road and Queens Parade.

Absolutely agree. Create own little precinct.

6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

That's what I thought, but I have been corrected.

Its back at the 2nd option, which is FAR better than the original one, in size, access, shape and transport options.

While the 3rd option is close to Caulfield station, maybe it was too close to the MRC facilities for their liking.

The 2nd option, the South east Corner, is about the furthest from the grandstands and MRC facilities and maybe that is all for the better.

It is also far from the school, not that they were concerned at all, as they are totally with us and supporting us and are excited by the MFC as a neighbour and that is from the horses mouth, pardon the pun.

Thanks Red... I agree.. SE location is the better of all options .

28 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This would have to be a match made in heaven for Demonlanders.

Reading this article written ahead of the draft with its references to Demonland you would think that the author had some premonition about which club was going to draft him. Then you realise that his local club is the Shepparton United Football Netball Club, nicknamed the Demons, and the penny drops. Still, he won’t be unfamiliar with his new colours.

Another fun fact is that he trained in the preseason with Collingwood. I already had a good feeling about pinching Brody Mihocek away from them and now an impressive young gun as well 😀

Destined to be a Demon.

Suffice to say... most at Demonland are quite happy 😉

30 minutes ago, Redleg said:

South East Corner, closest to where the ovals will be built.

That area is close to Glenhuntly station and if you walked from Caulfield station, through the Eastern/closest tunnel to the ovals, would be less than 5 minutes.

So its moved AGAIN ??

I thought they'd settled on the carpark off Normanby Rd ??

7 hours ago, Harvey Wallbanger said:

Actually it is not up to the Club to pick a time about an announcement on Caulfield. They will not be able to say anything meaningful until the State Government says they can. This has been the position for as long as the project has been worked on. Yes, it is getting closer, and yes it is entirely appropriate to update members at the AGM, but any defintive announcement will only emerge when the State Government says it can.

Sorry.. unless the state is paying for this ... which i doubt. Then I'm at a loss as to their control. ?

11 minutes ago, Oxdee said:

Does he have the polish or agility to play mid? Or do you think he will play more like Cripps?

Im sorry.. I'm a bit dim. I took Cripps to be a Mid.

Im inclined to think the polish comes with time and more experience. He doesn't strike me as an inside player. Nor do I see him being an outside runner type of utility. He seems quite happy to get his hands dirty and dig in.

He strikes me as a form of hybrid utility. He does remind me of Jackson in a fashion.

He's raw. I'm sure King has something in mind.

2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

to be training there in 2028 - as in the ovals will be ready by then?

seems awfully quick to get the buildings built

If they can turn the first sods early next year, then running on an oval for preseason 28 is quite feasible. I can only imagine the "building" will be composite tilt slab and steel skeleton.

We're not building a shopping mall here.

Where's a will there's a way. A servo can be up and running in 6 months.

It's all about project management

6 minutes ago, whelan45 said:

How do you go on long car trips? Hurry up driver are we there yet?

Thanks for quoting me 4 times...

Makes me feel spesh 😉 👍

This isn't so much a long trip... as circuitous laps around the block looking for a car park.

Well I thought we'd found that car park.

Still crickets ...