daisycutter

Ralph, when you have some spare time, can you come around to my place? I have these pig things flying around my backyard and i need your advice on what to do

no thoughts

Bobby "The Chimp" Skilton and the "Three Wise Monkeys" on World of Sport (Dyer, Davis, Richards) An unfortunate choice of words from an ignorant 13 year old. Unintentional racism? Probably. Hardly deserved the front page of the Sun complete with minor's picture and full name

good luck tonight nineteen (et al) it must be tough in the current circumstances...........appreciate your efforts

i understand the reasoning ldvc and tony but in practice it is like a set of handcuffs restraining weaker clubs and it flies in the face of pay for performance...........so yes it is certainly a marxist policy a salary max cap makes sense but a very high min (almost = max) makes less sense the result is a poor player is virtually guaranteed to be paid more at a weak club a top player at a weak club would not be penalised in practice at a weak club if the min was lowered

I understand where you are coming from on the salary cap Tony, but I think it would actually favour the richer clubs why? 1] the poorer clubs don't have the money or they have to cut back elsewhere e.g. FD spend 2] whilst there is a rule that you must pay 95% of cap you would easily end up with the worst side forced to pay the highest total salary (and still not landing any big fish) it is crazy that the worst side pays the same salary as the best side. Weaker clubs should be able to pay a far lower % of the cap even using performance incentives weak clubs are still forced to pay overs because of the 95% rule

yep, confirmed by vlad on otc couple of days ago..........get up to date DL.....

N....e...e...l...d...y.........g...e...t...s...........m...e.........r...e...a...l...l...y.......r...e...v...v...e...d......u...p T...r...o...o...l...y

hate to tell you satyr but the sky has already fallen for us, quite a while back we are just waiting for the earth to swallow us up, unless we do something about it and quickly at least we know we can always count on you to turn out the lights when necessary

smooth mkII ?

ummm......some football?

there are elite around the club? they must be masters of disguise

hullo sunshine good to see you back........sick of 'ology and dr poo?

i think they are more likely to spit you to death

Neeld himself might be ready as a senior coach in 3-5 years time - lol Pity about the players though.....at this rate of destruction it will be hard to survive as a club

Neeld the Communicator - LOL This is more than a tragedy its becoming a farce

thanks 316

The current method for board election doesn't seem to be very effective. In theory the members elect but what would they know In practise the members rarely get to vote for one reason or another I have concerns over how the AFL would appoint a complete board and if it would be totally in our best interests Maybe a compromise that say three board members are appointed by the AFL and the rest by the normal process with the AFL having to give a final sign-off This might satisfy both camps?..............Just a thought

i hear she is already a well developed young lady

sacrilege, redleg you just need to change your banana cake supplier

we did have a draw against the filth

i would have thought the opposite - bigger the basket case = more chance for pp

OK, i'm listening.......who are the last remnants?

if he can coach, just get him

according to today's paper he got 4 weeks and took discount to make it 3 weeks