daisycutter

good catch bub, you're quicker than autocool who didn't have his sarcasm monitor turned on

i doubt linden could spell objective let alone subjective just my objective opinion but

didn't you know the pyramids were really a giant power station powered by crystals and electro magnetic forces

don't laugh....i heard the afl havs cc's joke book and is threatening to leak it if we don't play afl-ball

listened religously to hop harrigan and tarzan after school ....and larry kent (censored by oldies) under the bed covers on the crystal set

desert boots, duffle coats and yakka brand-em jeans

comb,.... you remember,.... back pocket......the 60's equivalent of a mobile phone

i remember the days when disrepute was really looked down on rather than a badge of honour

californian poppy of course (moderately) brylcream was for the bodgies

me too dc used to watch it along with 77 sunset strip, surfside 6 and bonanza even had a kooky byrnes branded comb

well regardless of special picks "after the end of round one" for effectively 17 clubs still equals round one for 18 clubs to me to me it just means a "deprecated round 1" pick

Based on our on field results, it's hard to make a case that any form of training was even a remote success

I wonder if asada could conclude that more than one essendon player was administered banned substances but cannot identify exactly who Could they then ban the whole team for a specified time instead? (without any individual bans) They have a rule which says if two or more players in a team sport use banned substances then the team can be banned

nothing to worry about here he apparently used bondcrete instead of the aod cream by mistake

bummers don't get a first round pick in 2014 but they get the next pick after the first round this would be pick 18 errrr...isn't pick 18 a first round pick?

just gone 5pm bub - lol

both, of course

i thought it was 4pm

the deadline that wasn't

unless you are into archery or shooting - lol

it doesn't really matter what you believe bob in terms of fairness what matters is wada's rules and how they enforce them they are quite clear on player responsibility whether you think it fair or not their rules tend to be very rigid and inflexible (and this is/should be understood by all athletes who come under the wada umbrella)

personally in a global online marketplace i can't see the difference between buying local or "importing" it certainly is just another form of intent a body like the acc might see it different if said substance is banned from public use here, but we are talking about wada/asada, not the acc wade lees claimed he didn't know the supplement contained a banned substance fwiw if lees gets 2 years and the bummers get nothing it is plainly an unfair system (if not corrupted)

don't forget wade lees got 2 years for intent.....he never even used the drugs (in the supplement) he imported so you are right, asada don't have to actually prove consumption

i heard it was currently contemplating banning jamaica from next olympics