daisycutter

*proletariat*

uncle bitters, we held this thread in abeyance, in good-faith, for your good-self , in anticipation of your impending grandiloquence, now fgs just get on with it

don't think they have been de-balkanised yet earl. takes quite a few generations

you don't want to be down-wind of the gatwick, red

plenty of room at romsey manor. lads are quite excited

duh. thanks captain obvious so why not a suspended fine?

i'm not surprised either with typical mrp over-reaction. i just can't see that what he did was reportable fcs tackle on brayshaw was just as "dangerous" (rode him into the ground) but no report. where is consistency

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-29/young-demon-avoids-ban-for-sling-tackle i reckon that is stiff myself. why wasn't just a free kick sufficient. i didn't think it was that much of a sling. over-reaction by mrp can see a lot of controversy on that this year if they get that strict. there are plenty of other tackle types just as risky which only get a free kick

he even handballs like tintin

just use a thimble with some cotton wool, d-l, should do the trick nicely

Here's a demons jumper pattern. roll down to page 4 https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0fp04t8caabmeh/VFL%20knitted%20footy%20jumpers%20the%20Demons.pdf

i'd also add, macca that a lot of the hate for essendon is aimed at their attitude nd the way they have handled the issue and dragged it out as long possible. this whole issue could have been resolved 2 seasons ago if egos and arrogance hadn't got in the way. it's not just about the peds.

lol - love your optimism, ron. keep it up.

you could try contacting this mob https://www.etsy.com/au/search?q=knitted%20afl%20jumper&ref=market

this will be a job for bbo

1/1

i'd drop the quinoa, earl, or you'll start acting and talking like an incan, or worse still like one of uncle bitter's pigmy llamas errrr alpacas

dee-luded's not, i'm not. guess i'm a prat then

so, next time don't ask

reminds me of the spartans. Philip ii of macedon sent a message to the spartans " "You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city." to which the spartans replied "if". philip and his son alexander (the great) declined to invade sparta.

diets all wrong, earl. you need to talk to its time over on the paleo thread .....and give up those cuban cigars

try running around the clothesline 100 times twice a day - no charge for advice

"thye dees" you really are "old", od

whilst ldvc points out that this was not a criminal court conviction, it should be pointed out that burden of proof, whilst lower than a criminal court was still higher than that required for a civil court. regardless a conviction in all is still a conviction

spot-on ldvc. it's semantics. what would you prefer though as a title?