daisycutter

and petty might get a few games next year but is at least 2 years away from any serious form

try devon smith their b&f

is the limit 2 for cat b rookies?

2/2? well he failed on hurley

they had to play a lot of ps2 games and make sure jesse won most of them....

hmmmm, 4 hours at cockburn, that's a damn long medical.

fugazi clickbait or dumb shyte ignorance or both (likely)

very strange, bub. they've been working on this deal for over 4 years but still want to play funny buggers

71 games in 6 years for various reasons (and yeah i know the reasons) making it approx 12 games per year or 52.6%

our thoughts on melk at the time were also overlaid with the impending risk of asada suspension hanging over his head (which did eventuate) i got mixed info re his worth from essendon relos/friends. some i valued thought he would be a good pickup esp with a new start so yeah, the net results by many here were quite mixed

well freo must value hogan pretty highly since they have been after him non-stop for at least 4 years but wgaf what manure says or thinks?

you should have delayed this answer could have got another 20-30 pages on that rumour

he has 1 yr left on his contract and anyway we don't know yet if he does survive

was just what we need, a classy outside finishing mid, not another grunt inside mid like viney

i can smell a double ton just around the corner

you're right, forgot about them we need to keep them on-side but only until yarra park is built

yeah well they are going to play their cards close to their chest aren't they but ultimately they will want to clear their decks of may

coz they don't want to wait a year to get rid of may. they are in culture change mood

i say bring back the retro banners......i like balloons

and what would a fan (us incl) know about club to club negotiations....of course they would be laughing just as we are at the notion of just accepting may for hogan using a single 1st rounder. let them laugh their head off when they get hogan for a winning deal for mfc, coz it's gonna cost them big

that's why the trade must be result in a demonstrable improvement for the side, or it's off for 12 months

can't agree with this assessment, bub. as for getting these "same ridiculous offers", that is the point i made. if we get the good offers then fine, so far i'm seeing a lot of noise indicating offers that don't make us demonstrably better. as for next year, weagles bound to be in it big time. plus a lot can change in 12 months i don't want to see a hogan for may plus small change. we would be worse off imo no fire sale, hogan stays

the appropriate word would be "unlikely" rather than "realistically"

we should only trade if we end up demonstrably better off. best on offer is not acceptable unless it satisfies the former. if not, we keep hogan, no sweat, and go through it all again next year

any decent manager would tell him to make no public statements until it is resolved